Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of study characteristics

From: International migration and caesarean birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Characteristic

n (number of studies)

%

Language of publication

(n=76)

 

  English

62

81.6

  French

4

5.3

  Italian

3

5.3

  Spanish

1

2.6

  Norwegian

2

3.9

  German

4

1.3

Publication period

(n=76)

 

  < 1980

9

11.8

  1980-1989

6

7.9

  1990-1999

13

17.1

  2000-2012

45

59.2

  Unpublished

3

3.9

Data Sources

(n=76)

 

  Population-based data registries

21

27.6

  Population-based hospital data

2

2.6

  Population-based surveys

4

5.3

  Research study/hospital records

49

64.5

Variables adjusted

(n=19) *

 

  Maternal age

19

100

  Parity

17

89.5

  Education

7

36.8

  Gestational age

8

42.1

  Marital status

3

15.8

  Prenatal care

3

15.8

  Social economic status (poverty, income, under-housing, occupation)

4

21.1

  Birthweight

9

47.4

  Medical complications

2

10.5

  Mechanical factors

1

5.3

  Previous caesarean

1

5.3

  Pregnancy complications (multiple, preterm, fetal stress)

3

15.8

  Smoking & substance abuse

1

5.3

  Medical indications

2

10.5

  Onset of labour

1

5.3

  Maternal weight/BMI/diabetes

5

26.3

  Assisted reproductive technology

2

10.5

  Infant sex

4

21.1

  Hospital characteristics (level of care, size of hospital, private facility)

5

26.3

  Insurance status

2

10.5

  Birth year

1

5.3

  Time of day

1

5.3

  Location of institution

2

10.5

Coverage

(n=75) †

 

  National

15

19.7

  Regional

12

15.8

  Local

49

64.5

Data years

(n=75) ‡

 

  < 1980

12

12.6

  1980–1989

17

17.9

  1990–1999

28

29.5

  2000-2010

38

40.0

Number of migrants studied

(n=74) §

 

  < 1,000

32

43.2

  1,000-5,000

23

31.2

  > 5,000-10,000

5

6.8

  >10,000

14**

18.9

Source regions

(n=1,029,454) ††

 

  Sub-Saharan Africa

66,163

6.4

  North Africa/West Asia

65,689

6.4

  Latin America & Caribbean

404,729

39.3

  North America/Australia

8855

0.9

  East Asia

68,084

6.6

  South-East Asia

69,589

6.8

  South Asia

70,545

6.9

  Asia (unspecified)

46,842

4.6

  Oceania (unspecified)

18,005

1.7

  East Europe

27,922

2.7

  North/West Europe

58,065

5.6

  South Europe

16,336

1.6

  Unspecified

108,630

10.6

Receiving countries

(n= 76) ‡‡

 

  Australia

9

11.1

  Belgium

2

2.5

  Canada

5

6.2

  Finland

2

2.5

  France

6

7.4

  Germany

4

4.9

  Greece

3

3.7

  Holland

2

2.5

  Ireland

3

3.7

  Israel

3

3.7

  Italy

9

11.1

  Norway

10

12.3

  Portugal

1

1.2

  Spain

3

3.7

  Sweden

3

3.7

  Switzerland

1

1.2

  UK

6

7.4

  US

9

11.1

Quality of reports

(n=76)

 

  Good

22

28.9

  Fair

54

71.1

Caesareans

(n=64) §§

 

  Higher

13

20.3

  Higher/No different

12

18.8

  Lower

9

14.1

  Lower/No different

2

3.1

  Mixed

8

12.5

  No different

20

31.3

Emergency caesareans

(n=21) ***

 

  Higher

7

33.3

  Higher/No different

4

19.0

  Lower

0

0.0

  Lower/No different

0

0.0

  Mixed

0

0.0

  No different

10

47.6

Elective caesareans

(n=19) ***

 

  Higher

2

10.5

  Higher/No different

3

15.8

  Lower

5

26.3

  Lower/No different

2

10.5

  Mixed

1

5.3

  No different

6

31.6

  1. * Texeira 2010 did not specify variables controlled so excluded; each study may have controlled for more than one variable so total does not equal 19 (or 100%).
  2. † Texeira 2010 did not specify area of coverage; Small 2008 contained regional and national data coverage and so is counted twice.
  3. ‡ Texeira 2010 did not specify year(s) of data; total adds to more than 74 since a report may have data from more than one time period.
  4. § Number of migrants not provided in Giani 2011 and Parsons 1993.
  5. ** Kinston 2011 used weighted numbers.
  6. †† Total number of migrants studied across reports (overlap accounted for).
  7. ‡‡ Small 2008 studied migrants in 6 receiving countries.
  8. §§ Giani 2011, Ismail 2011, Le Ray 2006, Walsh, Robson & Foley 2009 and Walsh 2011 are excluded due to lack of data for overall caesarean rates; Studies where rates are not statistically compared are also excluded. Small 2008 was counted as 6 studies since results for 6 receiving countries were reported.
  9. *** Studies where rates are not statistically compared are excluded.