Skip to main content

Table 2 Adverse effect estimates from randomised controlled trials (Comparisons 2–4)

From: Maternal adverse effects of different antenatal magnesium sulphate regimens for improving maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review

Outcome or subgroup

Studies

Participants

Method (I2(%))*

RR (95% CI)

Comparison 2: lower dose versus higher dose magnesium sulphate IM maintenance: treatment of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia

2.1 Death due to 'toxicity’

    

2.1.1 4 g IV LD; 2 g/3 h IM MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [28]

126

F (NA)

0.25 (0.01, 6.05)

2.2 Stopped due to 'toxicity’

    

2.2.1 4 g IV LD; 2 g/3 h IM MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [28]

126

F (NA)

0.05 (0.01, 0.39)

2.3 Deferred or skipped doses

2 [27, 28]

176

F (0)

0.36 (0.20, 0.63)

2.3.1 4 g IV LD; 2 g/3 h IM MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [28]

126

F (NA)

0.43 (0.23, 0.83)

2.3.2 'Dhaka’ regimen* versus 'Bhalla’ regimen~

1 [27]

50

F (NA)

0.23 (0.07, 0.71)

2.4 Given calcium gluconate

    

2.4.1 'Dhaka’ regimen* versus 'Bhalla’ regimen~

1 [27]

50

F (NA)

0.25 (0.60, 1.06)

2.5 Respiratory depression

    

2.5.1 4 g IV LD; 2 g/3 h IM MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [28]

126

F (NA)

0.25 (0.01, 6.05)

2.6 Absent tendon reflexes

2 [27, 28]

176

F (0)

0.21 (0.10, 0.46)

2.6.1 4 g IV LD; 2 g/3 h IM MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [28]

126

F (NA)

0.20 (0.08, 0.50)

2.6.2 'Dhaka’ regimen* versus 'Bhalla’ regimen~

1 [27]

50

F (NA)

0.25 (0.06, 1.06)

2.7 Gluteal abscess (pain, phlebitis, inflammation)

    

2.7.1 4 g IV LD; 2 g/3 h IM MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [28]

126

F (NA)

No gluteal abscesses

2.8 Postpartum haemorrhage

    

2.8.1 4 g IV LD; 2 g/3 h IM MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [28]

126

F (NA)

0.38 (0.03, 4.03)

2.9 Pulmonary oedema

    

2.9.1 4 g IV LD; 2 g/3 h IM MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [28]

126

F (NA)

0.25 (0.01, 6.05)

Comparison 3: magnesium sulphate IV maintenance versus IM maintenance: treatment of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia

3.1 Death

    

3.1.1 4 g IV LD; 0.75 g/hour IV MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [29]

137

F (NA)

0.35 (0.04, 3.27)

3.2 Discontinuation or modification of treatment

2 [30, 31]

317

F (0)

1.46 (0.83, 2.58)

3.2.1 6 g IV LD; 2 g/hour MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [30]

17

F (NA)

3.33 (0.15, 71.90)

3.2.2 'Springfusor pump’ IV versus 'Standard’ IM regimen

1 [31]

300

F (NA)

1.41 (0.79, 2.52)

3.3 Clinical signs of toxicity

2 [29, 30]

154

R (38)

0.82 (0.05, 12.56)

3.3.1 4 g IV LD; 0.75 g/hour IV MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [29]

137

F (NA)

0.21 (0.01, 4.27)

3.3.2 6 g IV LD; 2 g/hour MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [30]

17

F (NA)

3.33 (0.15, 71.90)

3.4 Pain level 'acceptable’

    

3.4.1 'Springfusor pump’ IV versus 'Standard’ IM regimen

1 [31]

300

F (NA)

4.93 (3.59, 6.78)

3.5 Caesarean section

2 [29, 30]

154

F (0)

1.03 (0.78, 1.35)

3.5.1 4 g IV LD; 0.75 g/hour IV MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [29]

137

F (NA)

0.99 (0.75, 1.32)

3.5.2 6 g IV LD; 2 g/hour MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [30]

17

F (NA)

1.50 (0.47, 4.76)

3.6 Postpartum haemorrhage

    

3.6.1 4 g IV LD; 0.75 g/hour IV MD versus Pritchard’s regimen^

1 [29]

137

F (NA)

0.35 (0.04, 3.27)

Comparison 4: short versus standard (24 hours) postpartum magnesium maintenance therapy: treatment of pre-eclampsia

4.1 Toxicity

2 [32, 33]

256

F (NA)

0.25 (0.06, 1.08)

4.1.1 Short (12 h) versus standard (24 h)

1 [32]

196

F (NA)

No toxicity

4.1.2 Short (based on clinical criteria) versus standard (24 h)

1 [33]

60

F (NA)

0.25 (0.06, 1.08)

4.2 Side effects

    

4.2.1 Short (based on clinical criteria) versus standard (24 h)

1 [33]

60

F (NA)

0.17 (0.02, 1.30)

4.3 'Intolerance’

    

4.3.1 Short (based on clinical criteria) versus standard (24 h)

1 [33]

196

F (NA)

No intolerance

  1. ^Pritchard’s regimen: 4 g IV and 10 g IM LD; 5 g IM MD/4 hours.
  2. *Dhaka regimen: 4 g IV and 6 g IM LD; 2.5 g IM/4 hours.
  3. ~Bhalla regimen: 4 g IV and 8 g IM LD; 4 g IM/4 hours.
  4. I2statistics is a test of heterogeneity; where I2 was > 30% summary estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis; the bold effect estimates indicate statistical significance.
  5. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, F fixed-effect, g gram, h hour, IM intramuscular, IV intravenous, LD loading dose, MD maintenance dose, NA not applicable, R random-effects, RR risk ratio.