Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary: Quality of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation[11, 12]

From: Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review

Method

Quality of evidence

Balance of Benefits/Harms

Grade of Recommendation

Vaginal PGE2

Moderate

Trade-offs

Strong

Cervical PGE2

Moderate

Net benefits

Strong

Intravenous oxytocin

Moderate

Trade-offs

Strong

Amniotomy

Moderate

Uncertain trade-offs

Weak

Intravenous oxytocin plus Amniotomy

Moderate

Trade-offs

Strong

Vaginal misoprostol

Moderate

Trade-offs

Strong

Oral misoprostol

Moderate

Trade-offs

Strong

Mechanical methods

Moderate

Trade-offs

Weak

Membrane sweeping

Moderate

Net benefits

Strong

Extra-amniotic prostaglandins

Moderate

No net benefit

Strong (against)

Intravenous prostaglandins

Moderate

Net harms

Strong (against)

Oral prostaglandins

Moderate

Net harms

Strong (against)

Mifepristone

Moderate

Net harms

Weak

Oestrogens

Very Low

Uncertain trade-offs

Weak

Corticosteroids

Very Low

Uncertain trade-offs

Weak

Relaxin

Moderate

Uncertain trade-offs

Weak

Hyaluronidase

Very low

Uncertain trade-offs

Weak

Castor oil

Very Low

Net harms

Strong (against)

Acupuncture

Moderate

No net benefit

Weak

Breast stimulation

Moderate

Uncertain trade-offs

Weak

Sexual intercourse

Very low

Uncertain trade-offs

Weak

Homeopathic Methods

Very low

Uncertain trade-offs

Weak

Isosorbide mononitrate

Moderate

Uncertain trade-offs

Weak

Buccal or sublingual misoprostol

Moderate

Trade-offs

Strong

Hypnosis

Very low

No net benefit

Weak