This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Individual and health facility factors and the risk for obstructed labour and its adverse outcomes in south-western Uganda
© Kabakyenga et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 9 February 2011
Accepted: 14 October 2011
Published: 14 October 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Feb 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthews Mathai|
|23 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bukola Fawole|
|23 Aug 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Jerome Kabakyenga|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Aug 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthews Mathai|
|7 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bukola Fawole|
|1 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Jerome Kabakyenga|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Jerome Kabakyenga|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Oct 2011||Editorially accepted|
|14 Oct 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2393-11-73|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.