Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Individual and health facility factors and the risk for obstructed labour and its adverse outcomes in south-western Uganda

  • Jerome K Kabakyenga1, 2Email author,
  • Per-Olof Östergren1,
  • Eleanor Turyakira2,
  • Peter K Mukasa3 and
  • Karen Odberg Pettersson1
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth201111:73

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-73

Received: 9 February 2011

Accepted: 14 October 2011

Published: 14 October 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Feb 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthews Mathai
23 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bukola Fawole
23 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jerome Kabakyenga
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthews Mathai
7 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bukola Fawole
1 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jerome Kabakyenga
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jerome Kabakyenga
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 Oct 2011 Editorially accepted
14 Oct 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2393-11-73

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Social Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, CRC, Entrance 72, Sweden
(2)
Department of Community Health, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
(3)
EngenderHealth/Fistula Care Project, Kampala, Uganda

Advertisement