Skip to main content

Table 1 Odds (95% confidence interval) of being caesarean and other methods of pregnancy delivery, preterm births and high risk pregnancy by IOM, pre-pregnancy BMI categories and gestational weight gain per 0

From: Associations of maternal pre-pregnancy obesity and excess pregnancy weight gains with adverse pregnancy outcomes and length of hospital stay

 

Method of deliverya

Preterm birthb

Pregnancy complicationsc

 

Caesarean

Other

    
 

Age adjusted

Fully Adjusted§

Age adjusted

Fully adjusted§

Age adjusted

Fully adjusted¥

Age adjusted

Fully adjusted¢

IOM

        

Inadequate

0.89

(0.73,1.09)

0.79

(0.64,0.97)

0.79

(0.64,0.98)

0.78

(0.63,0.98)

2.27

(1.71,3.00)

2.41

(1.81,3.20)

0.58

(0.44,0.77)

0.58

(0.44,0.77)

Adequate

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Excess

1.29

(1.09,1.54)

1.34

(1.12,1.60)

1.25

(1.04,1.49)

1.24

(1.03,1.50)

0.63

(0.44,0.89)

0.53

(0.37,0.76)

2.10

(1.74,2.54)

2.15

(1.78,2.61)

Pre-pregnancy BMI

        

Underweight

0.95

(0.72,1.26)

0.89

(0.67,1.19)

1.21

(0.94,1.55)

1.28

(0.99,1.65)

1.68

(1.18,2.38)

1.69

(1.19,2.41)

0.64

(0.44,0.93)

0.67

(0.46,0.97)

Normal

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Overweight

1.40

(1.13,1.75)

1.40

(1.12,1.75)

0.82

(0.63,1.08)

0.79

(0.60,1.04)

0.82

(0.53,1.26)

0.72

(0.46,1.12)

2.15

(1.72,2.69)

2.16

(1.73,2.70)

Obese

2.19

(1.61,2.98)

2.08

(1.51,2.86)

0.77

(0.48,1.25)

0.71

(0.43,1.15)

1.31

(0.74,2.34)

1.08

(0.60,1.95)

3.28

(2.40,4.48)

3.33

(2.43,4.56)

Gestational weight gain (0.1 kg/week)

1.09

(1.03,1.15)

1.10

(1.04,1.16)

1.14

(1.09,1.20)

1.13

(1.07,1.20)

0.84

(0.76,0.92)

0.78

(0.71,0.86)

1.31

(1.24,1.38)

1.32

(1.25,1.40)

  1. a method of delivery was three categories: normal, caesarean and other delivery methods. Multinomial logistic regression was used, considering normal delivery as the reference category
  2. b Preterm birth: binary outcome as normal vs. premature. Logistic regression was used, considering premature birth as an outcome
  3. c High risk: binary outcome as normal vs. high risk. Logistic regression was used, considering high risk as an outcome
  4. § Fully adjusted model adjusted for maternal age, education, racial origin, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption, birth weight, gestation and high risk pregnancy
  5. ¥ Fully adjusted model adjusted for maternal age, education, racial origin, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption and high risk pregnancy