Midwives’ experiences of professional learning when practicing collegial midwifery assistance during the active second stage of labour: data from the oneplus trial

Table 3 Proportions of learning outcomes when practicing CMA based on various explanatory variables in the 1,430 births

	Primary midwife learnt something new during the intervention					Second midwife learnt something new during the intervention
	N = 1,430	n	Proportion	95% CI Lower	95% CI Upper	N = 1,430	n	Proportion	95% CI Lower	95% CI Upper
Work experience - primary midwife
< 2 years	476	362	0.76	0.72	0.80	453	158	0.35	0.30	0.39
2–5 years	322	138	0.43	0.37	0.48	299	128	0.43	0.37	0.48
6–20 years	314	110	0.35	0.30	0.40	306	137	0.45	0.39	0.50
> 20 years	278	61	0.22	0.17	0.27	283	122	0.43	0.37	0.49
Work experience - second midwife
< 2 years	227	78	0.34	0.28	0.41	230	140	0.61	0.55	0.67
2–5 years	258	117	0.45	0.39	0.51	252	120	0.48	0.41	0.54
6–20 years	423	225	0.53	0.48	0.58	418	168	0.40	0.35	0.45
> 20 years	447	228	0.51	0.46	0.56	435	114	0.26	0.22	0.30
Reciprocal feedback between the primary and second midwife
Yes	989	542	0.55	0.52	0.58	946	422	0.45	0.41	0.48
No	349	113	0.32	0.27	0.37	330	105	0.32	0.27	0.37
Time CMA ≥ 15 min
Yes	696	436	0.63	0.59	0.66	679	324	0.48	0.44	0.51
No	620	193	0.31	0.27	0.35	614	202	0.33	0.29	0.37

ISSN: 1471-2393