Table 2 Details of reported professional learning, feedback, and reflection from the primary and second midwives when practicing CMA in the 1,430 births
n (%) | |
|---|---|
The primary midwife reported acquiring new knowledge during the intervention* | |
Yes† | 672 (47.0) |
No | 719 (50.3) |
Missing data | 39 (2.7) |
The second midwife reported acquiring new knowledge during the intervention‡ | |
Yes | 546 (38.2) |
No | 797 (55.7) |
Missing data | 87 (6.1) |
Reciprocal feedback between the primary and second midwife* | |
Yes | 998 (69.8) |
No | 351 (24.5) |
Missing data | 81 (5.7) |
The second midwife provided feedback when not satisfied with the primary midwife’s technique to prevent SPT‡ | |
Yes | 137 (9.6) |
No | 61 (4.3) |
Missing data | 80 (5.6) |
The second midwife got feedback how the primary midwife experienced her presence‡ | |
Yes | 738 (51.6) |
No | 626 (43.8) |
Missing data | 66 (4.6) |