Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Fig. 1

From: Spontaneous regression of a giant uterine leiomyoma after delivery: a case report and literature review

Fig. 1

Ultrasound imgages from pre pregnancy to postpartum. (a) Ultrasound examination on December 14, 2018, showed multiple medium-to-low echogenicity (suggestive of leiomyomas) in the myometrium, with a larger one located in the posterior wall measuring approximately 3.5 × 4.0 × 2.7 cm (arrow). (b) Ultrasound examination on September 3, 2019, confirmed an early intrauterine pregnancy with an 8 mm embryo. Multiple medium-to-low echogenicity were observed in the myometrium, including a larger one in the posterior wall measuring approximately 5.5 × 3.5 cm (arrow), with a distinct boundary. (c) Ultrasound examination on April 30, 2020, 30 days postpartum, showed multiple heterogeneous hypoechoic masses in the uterine area. A large mass measuring 8.6 × 7.7 × 7.3 cm(arrow) was identified in the posterior wall. (d) Ultrasound examination on June 24, 2020 (> 2 months postpartum) showed an 8.6 × 3.6 cm hypoechoic mass (arrow) inside the uterine cavity with a distinct boundary. The hypoechoic mass inside the uterine cavity suggested a submucosal leiomyoma or a tissue residue. (e) Ultrasound examination on July 22, 2020, displayed a 6.5 × 3.4 cm hypoechoic mass (arrow) within the uterine cavity. (f) Ultrasound examination on April 19, 2021, indicated a 2.5 × 1.3 cm heterogeneous hypoechoic mass (arrow) within the uterine cavity. (g) Ultrasound examination on September 12, 2022, revealed a 1.0 × 1.0 cm hypoechoic mass (arrow) near the endometrium of the posterior wall of the uterine body. (h) Ultrasound examination on May 8, 2023, revealed no hypoechoic changes in the posterior wall (arrow)

Back to article page