First Author (Year) Country | N | Design | Anxiety and/or depression scale | Follow-up | Results | Quality Appraisal (Newcastle Ottawa Scale) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adams [16] (2011) Norway | (wish for) ECSÂ =Â 5,352 VAGÂ =Â 50,462 | Cohort | SCL-8 | 30wk preg 6 mnth PP | Anxiety and depression scores ECSÂ >Â VAG (AP and PP) *. Difference PP is not significant anymore when adjusted for SCL-8 score AP. | 8 stars (very good) Selection ++++ Comparability ++ Outcome ++ |
Garthus-Niegel [36] (2014) Norway | Prefer ECS, get VAGÂ =Â 112 Prefer ECS, get ECSÂ =Â 53 Normal VAGÂ =Â 1,493 | Cohort | WDEQ SCL-Anxiety IES EPDS | 17wk preg 32wk preg 8wk PP | Women who prefer ECS but deliver vaginally have; Higher depression and anxiety scores AP *** Higher post-traumatic stress PP *** and PPD ** compared to women without preference for ECS who deliver vaginally | 7 stars (good) Selection ++++ Comparability ++ Outcome + |
Wiklund [14] (2007) Sweden | (wish for) ECSÂ =Â 91 VAGÂ =Â 266 | Cohort | EPDS | 2Â days PP 3mnth PP | PPD ECSÂ =Â VAG | 4 stars (satisfactory) Selection +++ Comparability - Outcome + |