Use of a patient decision aid for prenatal screening for Down syndrome: what do pregnant women say?
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 30 January 2016
Accepted: 9 March 2017
Published: 20 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Jan 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Scala Carolina|
|6 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melissa Hill|
|7 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Esther Leiva Portocarrero|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melissa Hill|
|1 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Esther Leiva Portocarrero|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|20 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12884-017-1273-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.