Enhanced recovery after elective caesarean: a rapid review of clinical protocols, and an umbrella review of systematic reviews
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 21 November 2015
Accepted: 28 February 2017
Published: 20 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Nov 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kimberly Gregory|
|20 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Nicholl|
|20 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Halle-Ekane Edie Gregory|
|14 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Ellena Corso|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Halle-Ekane Edie Gregory|
|22 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ellena Corso|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|20 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12884-017-1265-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.