Measuring perinatal complications: methodologic issues related to gestational age
© Caughey; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 22 September 2006
Accepted: 30 August 2007
Published: 30 August 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Sep 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Dec 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ellen Hodnett|
|20 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pisake Lumbiganon|
|13 Jun 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Aaron Caughey|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Jun 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pisake Lumbiganon|
|3 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ellen Hodnett|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|23 Aug 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Matt Hodgkinson|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|23 Aug 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|30 Aug 2007||Editorially accepted|
|30 Aug 2007||Article published||10.1186/1471-2393-7-18|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.