Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of TOMIS II study participantsa

From: Longer postpartum hospitalization options – who stays, who leaves, what changes?

Characteristic

Site 1 (n = 250)

Site 2 (n = 250)

Site 3 (n = 250)

Site 4 (n = 250)

Site 5 (n = 250)

Maternal age in years (mean ± SD)b

31.7 ± 4.9

28.8 ± 5.1

29.3 ± 5.2

29.7 ± 5.7

27.0 ± 5.1

Gestation in weeks (mean ± SD)

39.5 ± 1.4

39.7 ± 1.4

39.7 ± 1.4

39.4 ± 1.7

39.4 ± 1.3

Birth weight in grams (mean ± SD)b

3344 ± 452

3525 ± 516

3564 ± 485

3404 ± 682

3517 ± 557

 

%

%

%

%

%

First live birth

43.4

42.0

40.4

46.0

44.0

Martial status c

     

Married

88.8

71.3

79.9

78.3

59.3

Common-law/living with partner

6.0

21.9

14.5

12.3

27.8

Never married/separated/widowed/divorced

5.2

6.9

5.6

9.4

12.9

Family income c,d

     

<$20,000

12.1

14.7

7.4

28.5

23.8

$20,000 to $39,999

18.2

20.7

13.0

18.4

19.7

$40,000 to $59,999

17.3

29.7

23.4

16.7

18.8

$60,000 to $79,999

16.0

17.2

22.1

13.6

17.0

≥$80,000

36.4

17.7

34.2

22.8

20.6

Born in Canada c

37.6

93.6

81.1

34.1

96.8

Self-reported ethnicity c

     

Canadian

26.9

94.3

79.2

37.0

93.6

Other than Canadian

73.1d

5.7

20.8

63.0f

6.4

Language spoken at home c

     

English/French

55.2

99.6

86.0

63.9

99.6

Other than English/French

44.8e

0.4

14.0

36.1f

0.4

Highest level of education c

     

Less than high school

4.5

9.7

11.6

17.1

13.4

High school

9.7

13.3

14.1

20.8

10.2

Some community college/technical school

5.3

14.5

10.4

8.6

13.4

Completed community college/technical school

19.8

33.5

24.1

17.6

29.7

Some university

10.1

5.6

9.6

6.9

5.3

University

50.6

23.4

30.1

29.0

28.0

  1. a originally published in Sword, W., Watt, S., Krueger, P. (2004). Implementation, Uptake, and Impact of a Provincial Postpartum Program, Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 36, 60–82
  2. b ANOVA indicated a statistically significant difference across sites (p < 0.05)
  3. c Chi-square test indicated a statistically significant difference across sites (p < 0.05)
  4. d 8.4% of the total sample did not report family income
  5. e 26.9% of the total sample at Site 1 "Chinese"; 15.5% "Jewish"; 23.6% spoke Chinese at home
  6. f 11.9% of the total sample at Site 4 "South Asian"; no predominant language "Other than English/French"