Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

Dependency of magnetocardiographically determined fetal cardiac time intervals on gestational age, gender and postnatal biometrics in healthy pregnancies

  • Peter van Leeuwen1Email author,
  • Silke Lange1,
  • Anita Klein1,
  • Daniel Geue1 and
  • Dietrich HW Grönemeyer2
BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series ¿ open, inclusive and trusted20044:6

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-4-6

Received: 30 January 2004

Accepted: 02 April 2004

Published: 02 April 2004

Abstract

Background

Magnetocardiography enables the precise determination of fetal cardiac time intervals (CTI) as early as the second trimester of pregnancy. It has been shown that fetal CTI change in course of gestation. The aim of this work was to investigate the dependency of fetal CTI on gestational age, gender and postnatal biometric data in a substantial sample of subjects during normal pregnancy.

Methods

A total of 230 fetal magnetocardiograms were obtained in 47 healthy fetuses between the 15th and 42nd week of gestation. In each recording, after subtraction of the maternal cardiac artifact and the identification of fetal beats, fetal PQRST courses were signal averaged. On the basis of therein detected wave onsets and ends, the following CTI were determined: P wave, PR interval, PQ interval, QRS complex, ST segment, T wave, QT and QTc interval. Using regression analysis, the dependency of the CTI were examined with respect to gestational age, gender and postnatal biometric data.

Results

Atrioventricular conduction and ventricular depolarization times could be determined dependably whereas the T wave was often difficult to detect. Linear and nonlinear regression analysis established strong dependency on age for the P wave and QRS complex (r2 = 0.67, p < 0.001 and r2 = 0.66, p < 0.001) as well as an identifiable trend for the PR and PQ intervals (r2 = 0.21, p < 0.001 and r2 = 0.13, p < 0.001). Gender differences were found only for the QRS complex from the 31st week onward (p < 0.05). The influence on the P wave or QRS complex of biometric data, collected in a subgroup in whom recordings were available within 1 week of birth, did not display statistical significance.

Conclusion

We conclude that 1) from approximately the 18th week to term, fetal CTI which quantify depolarization times can be reliably determined using magnetocardiography, 2) the P wave and QRS complex duration show a high dependency on age which to a large part reflects fetal growth and 3) fetal gender plays a role in QRS complex duration in the third trimester. Fetal development is thus in part reflected in the CTI and may be useful in the identification of intrauterine growth retardation.

Background

In recent years it has been shown that fetal magnetocardiography (FMCG) is suited for the determination of fetal cardiac time intervals (CTI) [17]. Various intervals reflecting atrial and ventricular de- and repolarization times have been identified on the basis of the waveforms of the P wave, the PR interval, the QRS complex, the T wave and others. These studies all examine the QRS complex and most present the P wave or PR interval but none report on all relevant CTI. The durations of the individual CTI studied tend to cover a wide range of values. In particular with respect to the P wave and QRS complex, one of the primary reasons for this is the dependency on the gestational age of the fetus. This is presumed to be associated with the increase in cardiac tissue mass and dimensions concomitant with fetal growth [8]. Also, it has been shown that the QRS complex may be influenced by the gender of the fetus [9]. Other CTI, such as those involving the T wave, display a high degree of variance because the onset and end of this wave can often not be determined unambiguously due to its low amplitude, low frequency nature.

Furthermore, it has been shown that there are systematic differences in CTI duration between the various groups active in this field [8]. One must thus presume that the equipment and procedures used in data acquisition and evaluation play a role in contributing to the distribution of the data. In previous work, we have examined factors such as biomagnetometer sensor configuration and observer reproducibility and have been able to show that the number of registration channels and signal-to-noise characteristics affect reliability in the determination of the CTI [10]. The same work showed, on the other hand, that inter-observer reproducibility was high when appropriate criteria in the determination of waveform boundaries were maintained. On the whole, there is consensus between most investigators that, in order to produce comparable results, certain guidelines should be followed in data acquisition, evaluation and documentation [11].

Various possibilities for the clinical application of FMCG have been proposed. With respect to CTI it has been suggested that their utility may lie in the identification of fetuses with arrhythmias [1214], congenital heart defects [15, 16] and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) [4, 17]. With IUGR in particular, the expectation is that, all other things being equal, the duration of the CTI will be shorter in compromised fetuses. Thus, in order to optimize the potential discriminatory power of the CTI, pertinent factors, not associated with disease states, which may influence CTI duration must be identified and their effect estimated. The aim of this work was to precisely determine all relevant CTI in a relatively large group of healthy fetuses and to investigate the effect of gestational age and gender using regression analysis. The results might serve as reference values for future work dealing with pathological fetal conditions. Furthermore, a preliminary attempt to associate CTI duration with postnatal biometric data was undertaken.

Methods

The subjects in this study included 43 women in 47 healthy pregnancies (32 ± 3 years of age) in which fetal gender was documented. Subjects excluded from this study were those in whom the fetuses exhibited arrhythmic beats [13], IUGR, congenital heart disease or in which maternal hypertension, diabetes or nicotine abuse was present. Of the included subjects, 20 were para 0, 23 para I and 4 para II. Twenty-eight (60%) of the fetuses were male, 19 (40%) were female. We recorded 255 FMCGs between the 12th and 42nd week of gestation, of which 230 displayed sufficient signal quality to enable evaluation. All of the 25 recordings which could not be evaluated were prior to the 20th week, the success rates between the 12th and 19th week being 0%, 0%, 0%, 17%, 29%, 17%, 80% and 90% (Fig. 1). Of the remaining 230 available FMCGs between the 15th and 42nd week of gestation, we obtained on average 4.9 ± 4.3 per fetus (range 1–23). In the period from the 18th to the 39th week, the number of recordings per week of gestation lay between 6 and 14 (10.0 ± 2.3), before the 18th and after the 39th week the number of recordings was between one and three per week of gestation (Fig. 1). Of all evaluated recordings, 116 (50.4%) were performed in male fetuses, 114 (49.6%) in female. The study is in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration, was approved by the local ethics committee and all mothers gave written informed consent.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2393-4-6/MediaObjects/12884_2004_Article_31_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Number of recordings Number of FMCG recordings obtained between the 12th and 42nd week of gestation. Viable recordings were available as early as the 15th week and, from the 20th week on, all recordings could be evaluated (no signal = signal-to-noise ratio too low for the identification of fetal QRS complexes; signal = sufficient signal quality for evaluation).

Data acquisition

FMCGs were acquired using a 61 channel biomagnetometer (Magnes 1300C, 4D Neuroimaging, San Diego) in 162 cases. The sensing channels are arranged as 4 concentric rings around a central channel with an overall diameter of 32.4 cm and an area of coverage of ca. 800 cm2. A configuration of 11 reference coils is used to detect ambient noise and intrinsic system noise is given as being less than 10 fT/Hz1/2 (fT: femtotesla) for frequencies > 5 Hz. A further 68 FMCGs were recorded using a 37 channel system (Krenikon, Siemens, Erlangen). This system consists of sensing coils configured as 1st order gradiometers (baseline 7 cm) in a hexagonal grid with an overall diameter of 19 cm (area of coverage: ca. 283 cm2). System noise is given as less than 30 fT/Hz1/2 for frequencies > 2 Hz and 10 fT/Hz1/2 for frequencies > 10 Hz. Previous work has shown that the estimation of CTI is comparable for these two systems [10]. For data acquisition the mothers were in a supine position with the biomagnetometer placed as close to the abdomen as possible while avoiding skin contact. The 61 channel system was positioned symmetrically over the abdomen, the lower rim over the pubis and the upper rim approximately over the xyphoid. The smaller 37 channel system was positioned such that channels at the center of the sensor displayed high amplitude fetal QRS complexes. Data were usually recorded for 5 minutes at a sampling rate of 1 kHz and with a bandpass of 1–200 Hz. To reduce the effects of external noise, all measurements were performed in a standard shielded room (AK3b, Vacuumschmelze, Hanau). Recordings were generally performed between 10 AM and 4 PM.

Data analysis

In each set of data, maternal heart beats were identified by correlation to a maternal QRS signal template and the maternal PQRST signal components were then digitally averaged and subsequently subtracted from the signal traces. In the resulting traces, fetal beats were similarly identified on the basis of a representative fetal QRS signal template. Fetal PQRST courses to be averaged were chosen on the basis of a good correlation (r ≥ 0.90) to the template (generally»300 beats). In the averaged data, the onsets (or endpoints) of the P wave, QRS complex and T wave were defined as the visually identifiable first (or last) deviation from the signal's baseline in any one channel out of all channels available for evaluation [11]. Due to the low amplitude of the T wave and possible DC drift, its onsets and end were determined on the basis of identifiable changes in amplitude at appropriate latencies. All channels were displayed individually avoiding overlap and within a fixed time window (20 ms/cm) and a defined range of amplitudes (0.1–0.5 pT/cm for the P and T wave, 0.5–1.0 pT/cm for the QRS complex). The onsets and ends were independently determined by two experienced investigators and their results were compared. The final value for each time point was set accordingly: in cases of differences > 2 ms both investigators re-evaluated and corrected the results, otherwise the results were averaged. These time points were then used to calculate the duration of the CTI. We determined the consecutive, non-overlapping (disjunct) intervals as follows: P wave = Pend - Ponset, PQ interval = QRSonset - Pend, QRS complex = QRSend - QRSonset, ST segment = Tonset - QRSend and T wave = Tend - Tonset. Furthermore, the following composite CTI were determined: PR interval = P wave + PQ interval and QT interval = QRS complex + ST segment + T wave (see Figure 2). Also, the rate corrected QT interval (QTc) was calculated according to Bazett's formula [18]. In some traces, signal quality did not permit the unequivocal identification of the timing of an event and the corresponding CTI were not determined.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2393-4-6/MediaObjects/12884_2004_Article_31_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Averaged FMCG signal FMCG signal traces from 4 selected channels of the averaged data of a recording performed in the 39th week of gestation. The vertical lines show how the signal onsets and ends were set and used to determine the cardiac time intervals. (B = magnetic field strength)

The dependency on gestational age was assessed for the CTI over all data sets using regression analysis. The same dependency in the male and female subgroups was similarly examined and compared. In order to examine the relationship between postnatal biometric data (birth weight, head circumference and crown-heel length) and the CTI, we examined the dependency of those intervals which clearly correlated to development. For this, only data sets in which the CTI were determined within the last 7 prepartum days were considered.

Statistics

Values describing the subject and FMCG acquisition groups were expressed as means ± standard deviation. Simple linear as well as nonlinear regression was used to estimate the parameters governing the change of the CTI over gestational age. For all regressions, the dependencies due to repeated measurements were considered by performing a robust regression using a modified Huber/White/Sandwich estimator of variance [19]. For any interval, the model that demonstrated the best fit, based on the coefficient of determination, was chosen as most appropriate. For those intervals displaying a clear dependency on gestational age with respect to the best fitting model, estimated values and 90% prediction intervals were calculated on a weekly basis. For those intervals lacking a clear dependency, measures of location were calculated overall. To examine the differences between male and female CTI at a specific week of gestation, all values of each gender were projected to that week on the basis of each sex's best fitting model and the projected group values compared using Mann-Whitney U test. The dependency of the CTI on biometric parameters was examined using simple linear regression. Statistical significance was assumed at a level of 0.05.

Results

Unambiguous identification of the waveform onsets and offsets was possible in virtually all of the fetal atrial and ventricular depolarization signals, with 99% of the P wave and PQ interval durations as well as 100% of the QRS complex durations available for evaluation. The onsets and ends of ventricular repolarization were markedly more difficult to identify. The determination rates of 94% for the T wave and the ST segment durations were achieved only by meticulous examination of the waveforms [10]. It follows that the results must be viewed with caution as the low amplitude, low frequency character of the T wave involved a higher risk of error.

Gestational age

The CTI showed varying dependency on gestational age: Figure 3 shows that, of the contiguous, disjunct intervals, in particular the duration of the P wave and QRS complex increased clearly over time whereas the PQ interval showed a slight tendency to decrease with age. The ST segment and T wave duration demonstrated a wide spread without a clear trend. The composite intervals were characterized by a modest positive relationship to week of gestation, primarily reflecting the influence of the depolarization times. Regression analysis confirmed the visual impression (Table 1) with statistically significant slopes for all intervals except the ST segment and the T wave. The model fits were especially good for the P wave and the QRS complex. Implementing non-linear models improved the fit for the PQ and PR interval as well as the QRS complex.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2393-4-6/MediaObjects/12884_2004_Article_31_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Scatter plots of fetal CTI vs. gestational age Duration of CTI with respect to gestational age: disjunct intervals (P wave, PQ interval, QRS complex, ST segment, T wave) in the top two rows, composite intervals (PR, QT and QTc interval) in the bottom row (males , females +).

Table 1

CTI dependency on gestational age. Dependency of fetal cardiac time intervals on gestational age (in weeks): coefficients of determination (r2), y-intercepts, slopes and the p-value of the slopes (values < .05 in bold type). Linear regression parameters are given for each disjunct interval (upper rows) and each composite interval (lower rows). Non-linear regression parameters are also given for those intervals in which an improved model fit was found (quadratic: PQ and PR interval, double logarithmic: QRS complex).

 

regression type

N

r 2

y-intercept (ms)

slope (ms/week)

p

slope (ms/week2)

p

P wave

linear

228

0.67

14.0

1.37

<0.001

  

PQ interval

linear

228

0.07

67.7

-0.49

<0.001

  

PQ interval

non-linear

228

0.13

14.2

3.38

0.021

-0.07

0.008

QRS complex

linear

230

0.62

19.3

0.92

<0.001

  

ln (QRS)

non-linear

230

0.66

1.8

0.60*

<0.001

  

ST segment

linear

217

0.01

60.4

0.32

0.169

  

T wave

linear

216

0.00

126.0

0.00

1.000

  

PR interval

linear

228

0.16

81.7

0.88

<0.001

  

PR interval

non-linear

228

0.21

20.0

5.35

<0.001

-0.08

0.002

QT interval

linear

216

0.07

205.8

1.24

<0.001

  

QTc interval

linear

216

0.06

326.6

1.65

<0.001

  

* the slope in this regression equation is ms/ln(week)

For the intervals showing the clearest changes over time (P wave and QRS complex) we calculated various measures of location on the basis of the best fitting models for each gestational week from the 17th to the 42nd (see Table 2, Table 3). Although the dependency on age was not as pronounced, we did the same for the PR and PQ intervals (Table 2). For the remaining intervals, the scatter of the data was too large to permit a meaningful differentiation according to week of gestation (see Fig. 3) and the numerical description of the data is given without reference to gestational age (Table 4).
Table 2

Weekly values for P, PQ and PR Estimated value for the P wave, PQ interval and PR interval and their respective 90% prediction interval (PI) based on each interval's best fitting regression model. Values from the 17th to the 42nd week are given. N is the number of case avaliable for the model in any respective week.

Gestational age week

N

P wave (ms) estimated value (90% PI)

PQ interval (ms) estimated value (90% PI)

PR interval (ms) estimated value (90% PI)

17

1

37 (27 – 48)

52 (34 – 71)

89 (67 – 110)

18

5

39 (28 – 49)

54 (35 – 72)

91 (70 – 113)

19

8

40 (30 – 50)

54 (36 – 73)

94 (73 – 115)

20

9

41 (31 – 52)

55 (37 – 74)

96 (75 – 117)

21

8

43 (32 – 53)

56 (38 – 74)

98 (77 – 119)

22

9

44 (34 – 55)

56 (38 – 75)

100 (80 – 121)

23

12

45 (35 – 56)

57 (39 – 75)

102 (81 – 123)

24

10

47 (36 – 57)

57 (39 – 75)

104 (83 – 125)

25

9

48 (38 – 59)

57 (39 – 75)

106 (85 – 127)

26

8

50 (39 – 60)

57 (39 – 75)

107 (86 – 128)

27

11

51 (41 – 61)

57 (39 – 75)

108 (88 – 129)

28

16

52 (42 – 63)

57 (38 – 75)

110 (89 – 130)

29

11

54 (43 – 64)

56 (38 – 75)

111 (90 – 131)

30

12

55 (45 – 65)

56 (38 – 74)

111 (90 – 132)

31

7

56 (46 – 67)

55 (37 – 73)

112 (91 – 133)

32

10

58 (47 – 68)

54 (36 – 73)

112 (92 – 133)

33

11

59 (49 – 70)

53 (35 – 72)

113 (92 – 134)

34

9

61 (50 – 71)

52 (34 – 71)

113 (92 – 134)

35

12

62 (52 – 72)

51 (33 – 69)

113 (92 – 134)

36

10

63 (53 – 74)

50 (31 – 68)

113 (92 – 134)

37

6

65 (54 – 75)

48 (30 – 67)

113 (92 – 134)

38

14

66 (56 – 76)

47 (28 – 65)

112 (91 – 133)

39

9

67 (57 – 78)

45 (26 – 63)

112 (91 – 133)

40

6

69 (58 – 79)

43 (25 – 62)

111 (90 – 132)

41

2

70 (60 – 81)

41 (22 – 60)

110 (89 – 131)

42

1

72 (61 – 82)

39 (20 – 58)

109 (88 – 131)

Table 3

Weekly values for QRS. Estimated value for the QRS complex (all, female and male data) and their respective 90% prediction interval (PI) based on the best fitting regression model. Values from the 17th to the 42nd week are given. N is the number of cases available for the model in any respective week. p values comparing the female and male QRS durations are given showing the transition to statistically distinguishable values at the 31st week (p values < .05 in bold type).

Gestational age week

N

QRS all (ms) estimated value (90% PI)

N

QRS female (ms) estimated value (90% PI)

N

QRS male (ms) estimated value (90% PI)

P

17

1

33 (28 – 40)

 

30 (24 – 37)

1

34 (29 – 41)

 

18

5

35 (29 – 41)

4

32 (26 – 39)

1

35 (30 – 42)

 

19

8

36 (30 – 42)

5

34 (28 – 41)

3

37 (31 – 44)

 

20

9

37 (31 – 44)

5

36 (30 – 42)

4

38 (32 – 45)

 

21

8

38 (32 – 45)

3

38 (32 – 44)

5

39 (33 – 46)

 

22

9

39 (33 – 46)

5

39 (33 – 45)

4

40 (34 – 48)

 

23

13

40 (34 – 47)

7

40 (34 – 46)

6

41 (34 – 49)

 

24

11

41 (35 – 49)

8

41 (35 – 48)

3

42 (35 – 50)

 

25

9

42 (36 – 50)

4

43 (36 – 49)

5

43 (36 – 51)

0.576

26

8

43 (37 – 51)

6

44 (37 – 50)

2

44 (37 – 53)

0.537

27

11

44 (37 – 52)

5

44 (38 – 51)

6

45 (38 – 54)

0.467

28

16

45 (38 – 53)

8

45 (39 – 51)

8

46 (39 – 55)

0.335

29

11

46 (39 – 54)

9

46 (40 – 52)

2

47 (40 – 56)

0.211

30

12

47 (40 – 55)

4

47 (41 – 53)

8

48 (40 – 57)

0.100

31

7

48 (41 – 57)

1

48 (41 – 54)

6

49 (41 – 58)

0.034

32

10

49 (41 – 58)

5

48 (42 – 54)

5

50 (42 – 59)

0.009

33

11

50 (42 – 59)

8

49 (43 – 55)

3

51 (43 – 61)

0.001

34

9

51 (43 – 60)

3

49 (43 – 55)

6

52 (43 – 62)

<0.001

35

12

52 (44 – 61)

3

50 (44 – 56)

9

53 (44 – 63)

<0.001

36

10

52 (44 – 62)

3

50 (44 – 57)

7

54 (45 – 64)

<0.001

37

6

53 (45 – 63)

4

51 (45 – 57)

2

54 (46 – 65)

<0.001

38

14

54 (46 – 64)

6

51 (45 – 57)

8

55 (46 – 66)

<0.001

39

9

55 (47 – 65)

5

52 (46 – 58)

4

56 (47 – 67)

<0.001

40

6

56 (47 – 66)

1

52 (46 – 58)

5

57 (48 – 68)

 

41

2

57 (48 – 67)

1

53 (46 – 59)

1

58 (48 – 69)

 

42

1

58 (49 – 68)

 

53 (47 – 59)

1

59 (49 – 70)

 
Table 4

Values for ST, T and QT. Measures of location for those intervals demonstrating no dependency on gestational age.

  

N

minimum

5th percentile

median

95th percentile

maximum

ST segment

(ms)

217

13

35

72

96

107

T wave

(ms)

216

73

96

124

160

180

QT interval

(ms)

216

176

192

245

290

306

QTc interval

(ms)

216

278

300

380

443

460

Gender

With respect to fetal gender, most intervals showed no obvious differences in duration (Figure 3). However, the duration of the QRS complex seemed to be shorter in the females, particularly after the 30th week of gestation. As this suggested a different development between the two sexes, we examined the dependency on age separately for these subgroups using different models. We found that the best fitting model for the males was logarithmic (ln(QRS) = 0.594*ln(week) + 1.852, r2 = 0.64, p < 0.001) and hyperbolic for females (QRS = -646*(1/week)+68, r2 = 0.71, p < 0.001). Using these respective models to adjust for different weeks of gestation showed that QRS duration differed significantly between gender from the 31st week onward. We thus used these model to calculate values for the QRS complex separately for male and female subjects (Table 3).

Biometric data

As the P wave and QRS complex showed a distinct relationship to gestational age reflecting fetal growth, we assumed that an association to postpartum biometric parameters might exist. We therefore examined the duration of these two intervals with respect to birth weight, head circumference and crown-heel length in those fetuses in whom MCG recording were obtained within 7 days of parturition. None of the intervals showed a statistically significant relationship to the biometric data (Table 5). However a trend was apparent for head circumference, especially with respect to the QRS complex.
Table 5

CTI dependency on biometric data. Dependency of P wave and QRS (determined ≤ 7 days before birth) on birth weight, crown-heel length and head circumference at birth

  

N

r 2

intercept

slope

p

birth weight (g)

P wave

15

0.01

64.6

0.0010

0.768

 

QRS complex

15

0.08

43.7

0.0029

0.198

crown-heel length (cm)

P wave

14

0.06

98.5

-0.589

0.303

 

QRS complex

14

0.08

27.7

0.490

0.143

head circumference (cm)

P wave

14

0.16

10.9

1.63

0.113

 

QRS complex

14

0.27

-2.0

1.57

0.067

Discussion

The main findings of this study are that, of the time intervals that compose fetal cardiac electrophysiological activity, atrial and ventricular depolarization times clearly increase in the second and third trimester of pregnancy and that these changes are in part dependent on gender. Furthermore, ventricular repolarization duration and intervals not involving depolarization do not demonstrate these dependencies.

Our results are in general agreement with those in Stinstra et al [8] which included a large amount of data contributed by a number of laboratories. However that study had the difficulty that the data showed systematic differences between the data of the contributing centers. There may be various reasons for this bias resulting from different recording and evaluation techniques [10]. The work presented here largely avoids these technical difficulties and we may thus expect the observed trends and variance to reflect more closely the physiological factors involved.

A further difficulty in comparing the published results of different groups is that the documentation of the changes during pregnancy takes on various forms. The reports may include mean and extreme values averaged over ≥ 4 week periods [1, 3, 57] or regression-based estimated values [8, 17, 20]. The data may be plotted with or without confidence intervals [48, 17, 20]. In some of the work, estimations of age dependency are given, based on correlation and/or regression analysis [1, 48, 17, 20]. In this report we have given most of this information on all CTI we examined and we have included a week by week descriptive analysis for those CTI displaying a distinct dependency on age, namely the P wave, PR and PQ interval as well as the QRS complex. Considering the size of the study population and the relatively consistent recording and evaluation procedures applied in accordance with accepted standards [11], these values may serve as reference values.

We did not consider it appropriate to take the effect of gestational age into account for the QT and QTc intervals although they showed a statistically significant slope in the regression analysis. These intervals, as well as the ST segment and T wave, were characterized by low coefficients of determination (< 0.08), indicating that the effect of age was minimal with a wide spread of data at any specific gestational age and a large data overlap over extended gestational periods. Thus a realistic estimation of their duration can be made independently of age.

The distinct relationship between depolarization times and age has often been posited to reflect changes in heart size over gestation [e.g. [8]]: the larger the cardiac chambers, the more time needed for the depolarization wave to travel over the myocardium. Indeed, mammalian hearts display a dependency on body mass with respect to organ size and conduction time [21]. The weight of the fetal heart has been shown increase over time both with respect to body weight and gestational age [22] and estimations of fetal cardiac dimensions and mass based on ultrasound recording show a steady increase over time [2325]. The estimation of these dependencies are, more often than not, described more adequately using quadratic polynomials than a linear model. This reflects the slowing of the increase in size with a concomitant higher variance towards the end of pregnancy. With respect to the change of QRS duration over time, we found a similar trend in the data and, consequently, that nonlinear models fitted more appropriately. This has also been noted by others on the basis of fetal ECG data [9, 26] and further supports the notion of the link between fetal cardiac dimension and interval duration.

We compared representative CTI values in the terminal period of pregnancy, based on our data, to neonatal and infant PR, QRS and QT times found in the literature [27, 28]. These showed a high degree of agreement for the duration of AV conduction and ventricular depolarization. With respect to the T wave, the FMCG measures of location were lower than those reported for the newborns. This may be attributed to the rate dependency of the QT times, as the prepartal heart rate is higher than postpartal. Another reason for the difference may be the difficulty in the determination of the FMCG T wave, its low amplitude waveform shape leading to underestimation of its length.

On the basis of our findings, one further factor leading to the greater variance of QRS duration towards the end of pregnancy can be presumed to be fetal gender: a trend to lower values for females was distinguishable after the 30th week. Gender based differences in QRS duration have also been noted by Brambati and Pardi [9], albeit not statistically significant. Furthermore, in pediatric populations, QRS duration has been shown to be shorter in girls than in boys [28, 29]. Females are characterized by a lower birth weight than males, in particularly at later gestational ages [30]. This trend was also present in our subjects (males 3716 ± 555 g, females 3438 ± 497 g, p = 0.088). In the light of the above, the trend to shorter female QRS duration may correspond at least in part to their lower body weight. This fact will be of importance, for example, when investigating the possible association between growth retardation and CTI [17, 20] in order to avoid masking reduced QRS duration in male subjects.

The results with respect to biometric data were inconclusive: only head circumference displayed a weak relationship to QRS duration. This was surprising, in particular for birth weight, as such a dependency has been reported in a larger collective [9]. One of the reasons for the lack of correlation in our data may have been due to the fact that only 15 FMCG recordings performed within one week of birth were available for analysis. Furthermore, the relationships between fetal depolarization times, heart size and body weight discussed above are largely based on longitudinal studies. Examining the relationship on a cross section of subjects within a narrow range of time at the end of pregnancy when most biometric values are stabilizing will make the identification of a trend difficult and will likely require a substantial number of cases. It is however interesting to note that head circumference, which showed a weak correlation to QRS, has been identified as being more reliable than other biometric parameters in the estimation of fetal age [31, 32].

The overall high number of FMCG recordings permitted a reliable statistical description of the data with respect to the gestational period observed. However, the results are limited by the moderate number per week of gestation (ca. [10]). We did not deem this enough to give a stable description per week and we preferred instead to extrapolate weekly values on the basis of regression analysis parameters. A higher number of subjects and recordings would alleviate this limitation. Another aspect which must be kept in mind is that the precise determination of gestational age is a prerequisite for the correct estimation of dependency. We established gestational age as the computed interval between the date of last normal menses and the date of recording. Although other measures exist [33], we chose this procedure as it is commonly used and we did not always have access to ultrasound biometrics or other documentation.

Conclusions

In summary, we may conclude that fetal CTI which quantify depolarization times can be reliably determined using FMCG from approximately the 18th week to term, that P wave and QRS complex duration show a high dependency on age which to a large part reflects fetal growth and that fetal gender plays a role in QRS complex duration. Fetal development is thus reflected in the CTI and may be useful in the identification of pathological states such as intrauterine growth retardation.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biomagnetism, Research and Development Center for Microtherapy (EFMT)
(2)
Grönemeyer Institute for Microtherapy, University of Witten/Herdecke

References

  1. Quinn A, Weir A, Shahani U, Bain R, Maas P, Donaldson G: Antenatal fetal magnetocardiography: a new method for fetal surveillance?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994, 101: 866-870.View ArticlePubMed
  2. Van Leeuwen P, Schüβler M, Bettermann H, Lange S, Hatzmann W: Magnetocardiography for assessment of fetal heart actions. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1995, 55: 642-646.View ArticlePubMed
  3. Menendez T, Achenbach S, Moshage W, Flüg M, Beinder E, Kollert A, Bittel A, Bachmann K: Prenatal recording of fetal heart action with magnetocardiography. Z Kardiol. 1998, 87: 111-118. 10.1007/s003920050162.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Leuthold A, Wakai RT, Martin CB: Noninvasive in utero assessment of PR and QRS intervals from the fetal magnetocardiogram. Early Hum Dev. 1999, 54: 235-243. 10.1016/S0378-3782(98)00100-5.View ArticlePubMed
  5. Horigome H, Takahashi MI, Asaka M, Shigemitsu S, Kandori A, Tsukada K: Magnetocardiographic determination of the developmental changes in PQ, QRS and QT intervals in the foetus. Acta Paediatr. 2000, 89: 64-67. 10.1080/080352500750029086.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Kähler C, Schleussner E, Grimm B, Schneider A, Schneider U, Nowak H, Seewald HJ: Fetal magnetocardiography: development of the fetal cardiac time intervals. Prenat Diagn. 2002, 22: 408-414.View ArticlePubMed
  7. Lowery CL, Campbell JQ, Wilson JD, Murphy P, Preissl H, Malak SF, Eswaran H: Noninvasive antepartum recording of fetal S-T segment with a newly developed 151-channel magnetic sensor system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003, 188: 1491-1496. 10.1067/mob.2003.367.View ArticlePubMed
  8. Stinstra J, Golbach E, van Leeuwen P, Lange S, Menendez T, Moshage W, Schleussner E, Kaehler C, Horigome H, Shigemitsu S, Peters MJ: Multicentre study on the fetal cardiac time intervals using magnetocardiography. BJOG. 2002, 109: 1235-43.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Brambati B, Pardi G: The intraventicular conduction time of fetal heart in uncomplicated pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980, 87: 941-949.View ArticlePubMed
  10. Van Leeuwen P, Lange S, Klein A, Geue D, Zhang Y, Krause HJ, Grönemeyer D: Reproducibility and reliability of fetal cardiac time intervals using magnetocardiography. Physiol Meas. 2004, 25: 539-552. 10.1088/0967-3334/25/2/011.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Grimm B, Haueisen J, Huotilainen M, Lange S, Van Leeuwen P, Menendez T, Peters MJ, Schleussner E, Schneider U: Recommended standards for fetal magnetocardiography. PACE. 2003, 26: 2121-2126. 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00330.x.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Wakai RT, Leuthold AC, Wilson AD, Martin CB: Association of fetal junctional rhythm and respiratory arrhythmia detected by magnetocardiography. Pediatr Cardiol. 1997, 18: 201-203. 10.1007/s002469900150.View ArticlePubMed
  13. Van Leeuwen P, Hailer B, Bader W, Geissler J, Trowitzsch E, Grönemeyer DHW: Magnetocardiography in the diagnosis of fetal arrhythmia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999, 106: 1200-1208.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Menendez T, Achenbach S, Beinder E, Hofbeck M, Schmid O, Singer H, Moshage W, Daniel WG: Prenatal diagnosis of QT prolongation by magnetocardiography. PACE. 2000, 23: 1305-1307.View ArticlePubMed
  15. Quartero HW, Stinstra JG, Golbach EG, Meijboom EJ, Peters MJ: Clinical implications of fetal magnetocardiography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002, 20: 142-153. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00754.x.View ArticlePubMed
  16. Kähler C, Grimm B, Schleussner E, Schneider A, Schneider U, Nowak H, Vogt L, Seewald HJ: The application of fetal magnetocardiography (FMCG) to investigate fetal arrhythmias and congenital heart defects (CHD). Prenat Diagn. 2001, 21: 176-182. 10.1002/1097-0223(200103)21:3<176::AID-PD22>3.0.CO;2-W.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Van Leeuwen P, Lange S, Hackmann J, Klein A, Hatzmann W, Grönemeyer D: Assessment of intra-uterine growth retardation by fetal magnetocardiography. In Biomag Proc 12th Int Conf on Biomagnetism: 13–17 August 2000; Helsinki. Edited by: Nenonen J, Ilmoniemi RJ, Katila T. 2001, Espoo Helsinki Univ Technology, 603-606.
  18. Bazett HC: An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms. Heart. 1920, 7: 353-370.
  19. Williams RL: A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000, 56: 645-646.View ArticlePubMed
  20. Van Leeuwen P, Klein A, Lange S, Böhle K, Hatzmann W, Grönemeyer D: Changes in cardiac time intervals in growth retarded fetuses as determined by fetal magnetocardiography. IFMBE Proc. 2002, 3: 1524-1525.
  21. Meijler FL: Atrioventricular conduction versus heart size from mouse to whale. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985, 5: 363-365.View ArticlePubMed
  22. Guihard-Costa AM, Menez F, Delezoide AL: Organ Weights in Human Fetuses after Formalin Fixation. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2002, 5: 559-578. 10.1007/s10024-002-0036-7.View ArticlePubMed
  23. St John Sutton MG, Gewitz MH, Shah B, Cohen A, Reichek N, Gabbe S, Huff DS: Quantitative assessment of growth and function of the cardiac chambers in the normal human fetus: a prospective longitudinal echocardiographic study. Circulation. 1984, 69: 645-654.View ArticlePubMed
  24. Shapiro I, Degani S, Leibovitz Z, Ohel G, Tal Y, Abinader EG: Fetal cardiac measurements derived by transvaginal and transabdominal cross-sectional echocardiography from 14 weeks of gestation to term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998, 12: 404-418. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12060404.x.View ArticlePubMed
  25. Firpo C, Hoffman JI, Silverman NH: Evaluation of fetal heart dimensions from 12 weeks to term. Am J Cardiol. 2001, 87: 594-600. 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01437-5.View ArticlePubMed
  26. Taylor MJ, Smith MJ, Thomas M, Green AR, Cheng F, Oseku-Afful S, Wee LY, Fisk NM, Gardiner HM: Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography in singleton and multiple pregnancies. BJOG. 2003, 110: 668-678.View ArticlePubMed
  27. Davignon A, Rautaharju P, Boiselle E, Soumis F, Megelas M, Choquette A: Normal ECG standards for infants and children. Pediat Cardiol. 1979, 1: 123-152.View Article
  28. Rijnbeek PR, Witsenburg M, Schrama E, Hess J, Kors JA: New normal limits for the paediatric electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J. 2001, 22: 702-711. 10.1053/euhj.2000.2399.View ArticlePubMed
  29. Vaksmann G, Elkohen M, Duhamel A, Godart F: Signal-averaged electrocardiography in healthy children: influence of age, body size, and gender. PACE. 1996, 19: 1629-1634.View ArticlePubMed
  30. Alexander GR, Kogan MD, Himes JH: 1994–1996 U.S. singleton birth weight percentiles for gestational age by race, Hispanic origin, and gender. Matern Child Health J. 1999, 3: 225-231. 10.1023/A:1022381506823.View ArticlePubMed
  31. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK: Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology. 1984, 152: 497-501.View ArticlePubMed
  32. Nahum GG, Stanislaw H: Ultrasonographic prediction of term birth weight: how accurate is it?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003, 188: 566-574. 10.1067/mob.2003.155.View ArticlePubMed
  33. O'Rahilly R, Muller F: Prenatal ages and stages-measures and errors. Teratology. 2000, 61: 382-384. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(200005)61:5<382::AID-TERA10>3.3.CO;2-X.View ArticlePubMed
  34. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2393/​4/​6/​prepub

Copyright

© van Leeuwen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.

Advertisement