Academic performance, educational aspiration and birth outcomes among adolescent mothers: a national longitudinal study

  • Yiqiong Xie1,

    Affiliated with

    • Emily Wheeler Harville1Email author and

      Affiliated with

      • Aubrey Spriggs Madkour2

        Affiliated with

        BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth201414:3

        DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-3

        Received: 2 July 2013

        Accepted: 21 November 2013

        Published: 15 January 2014

        Abstract

        Background

        Maternal educational attainment has been associated with birth outcomes among adult mothers. However, limited research explores whether academic performance and educational aspiration influence birth outcomes among adolescent mothers.

        Methods

        Data from Waves I and IV of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) were used. Adolescent girls whose first pregnancy occurred after Wave I, during their adolescence, and ended with a singleton live birth were included. Adolescents’ grade point average (GPA), experience of ever skipping a grade and ever repeating a grade, and their aspiration to attend college were examined as predictors of birth outcomes (birthweight and gestational age; n = 763). Univariate statistics, bivariate analyses and multivariable models were run stratified on race using survey procedures.

        Results

        Among Black adolescents, those who ever skipped a grade had higher offspring’s birthweight. Among non-Black adolescents, ever skipping a grade and higher educational aspiration were associated with higher offspring’s birthweight; ever skipping a grade was also associated with higher gestational age. GPA was not statistically significantly associated with either birth outcome. The addition of smoking during pregnancy and prenatal care visit into the multivariable models did not change these associations.

        Conclusions

        Some indicators of higher academic performance and aspiration are associated with better birth outcomes among adolescents. Investing in improving educational opportunities may improve birth outcomes among teenage mothers.

        Keywords

        Adolescents Birthweight Gestational age Academic performance Educational aspiration

        Background

        In 2011, there were 333,771 live births to mothers age 10-19 in the U.S [1]. Negative pregnancy and birth outcomes, such as infant mortality [24], stillbirth [5], congenital anomalies [6], preterm birth (PTB), and low birthweight (LBW) [7] disproportionately affect adolescent compared to adult mothers. Unfortunately, most research on determinants of birth outcomes has focused on adult rather than teen mothers. Given the large number of adolescent births and the related pregnancy complications, it is important to explore factors that influence birth outcomes specifically within the teenage group.

        Among adult mothers, maternal educational attainment is positively linked with birth outcomes [814]. Lower education has been associated with elevated risks of low birthweight [11, 13], preterm birth [8, 11, 14], small for gestational age [8, 11, 12], still birth [8], and infant death [8]. One study found that there was a positive linear relationship between maternal year of schooling and birthweight in black women, and a non-linear relationship in white women, with the optimal level of schooling with regard to birthweight being about 16 years and lower or higher levels of education associated with lower birthweight [9].

        Although evidence of the association between maternal educational attainment and birth outcomes has been consistent, there remain uncertainties about the explanation for the association [9]. Fuchs argues that educated people invest in their own and their offspring’s health in terms of healthy behaviors and utilization of health care services [15]. Women with lower educational attainment are more likely to smoke during pregnancy [1618], and some researchers reported that the relationship between lower maternal education and adverse perinatal outcomes was (partly) explained by smoking during pregnancy [11, 14, 19]. Other studies found that maternal education and smoking during pregnancy had independent effects on small-for-gestational-age births and child’s antisocial behaviors [12, 16]. Women with lower education are also more likely to have less or delayed prenatal care [2022].

        The Healthy People 2020 agenda includes goals related to improving adolescents’ academic success and achievement [23]. Academic performance and educational aspiration during adolescence are found to be related to educational attainment in adulthood [24, 25]. Rumberger reported that grade retention and poor academic performance were important factors that were predictive of dropping out of middle school [24]. Grade skipping, which is one form of grade acceleration [26], has been found to be associated with better future educational and occupational outcomes in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics among males, and with a higher likelihood of pursuing law degrees and medical degrees in females [27]. Academic performance and educational expectation have also been negatively associated with a number of risky behaviors, such as cigarette smoking [2831], alcohol drinking [30, 31], use of marijuana [30, 31], early sexual initiation [32] and violence [33, 34]. Thus it is reasonable to hypothesize that adolescents’ academic performance and educational aspiration might be related with birth outcomes through behavioral intermediaries.

        However, while there has been growing literature on maternal educational attainment and birth outcomes among adult mothers, less research has been conducted exploring whether academic performance and educational aspiration influence birth outcomes among adolescent mothers. Teen mothers have been found to have poorer educational performance compared to other teens [35, 36]. This raises the question of a potential relationship between adolescents’ academic performance, educational aspiration and birth outcomes.

        The purpose of the present study is to examine how maternal academic performance and educational aspiration during adolescence are related to birth outcomes among adolescent mothers. In addition, we examine whether these relationships, if any, can be explained by maternal smoking during pregnancy and utilization of prenatal care. We use data from a nationally-representative survey of school-attending youth who have completed their teenage years and thus have complete data on teenage pregnancies. Results will add to existing literature on the determinants of birth outcomes among adolescents.

        Methods

        Data

        Data from waves I and IV of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) contractual dataset were utilized [37]. Add Health is a prospective cohort study of a nationally-representative sample of youth enrolled in grades 7-12 in the 1994-95 school year (Wave I) [38]. Follow-up interviews were conducted in 1996 (Wave II), 2001 (Wave III), and 2007-08 (Wave IV). A multistage probability clustered sampling design was used to obtain its Wave I sample. The first stage was a stratified, random sample of all public and private high schools in the U.S. A feeder school was also recruited from each participating community. In-school surveys were attempted with all students attending participating schools; a total of 90,118 were completed. In the second Wave I sampling stage, a sample of adolescents was drawn for in-depth in-home interviews, consisting of a random core sample plus selected special oversamples; a total of 20,745 interviews were conducted at this stage. At Wave II, most students (except Wave I seniors) were eligible for re-interview; at Waves III and IV, all respondents to the Wave I in-home interview were eligible for re-interview. A total of 15,701 interviews were conducted at Wave IV (80.3% response rate). Sampling weights adjusted for both unequal probabilities of selection into the original sample and for loss to follow-up. The present study was deemed exempt by the IRB at Tulane University.

        We applied a number of sample inclusion criteria. First, we limited to females who participated in Wave IV, as that was the Wave when all respondents had completed their teenage years and had complete teen pregnancy data. Second, we limited to female participants with valid sampling weights in order to make generalizations to the U.S. population. Third, we limited to females whose first pregnancies occurred during adolescence, after Wave I and ended with a singleton live birth to ensure the temporal ordering of predictors and outcomes (n = 978). Finally, we limited to females with complete information on all covariates. This left us with an analysis sample of 763 teen singleton live births.

        Measures

        Outcomes

        At Wave IV girls were asked about previous pregnancies and their outcomes. If they indicated they had given birth, they were asked “How much did the baby weigh at birth?”, “Was [baby’s name] born before or after [his/her] due date?” and then “How many weeks or days early/late was [baby’s name] born?” This was subtracted from 40 weeks to calculate gestational age. Birthweight was examined in kilograms and gestational age was examined in weeks.

        Predictors

        Academic performance

        We measured adolescents’ grade point average (GPA) based on their self-reported school performance in four subjects in Wave I in-home interview: English or language arts, mathematics, history or social studies, and science. Letter grades of A, B, C, and D were coded as 4, 3, 2, and 1, respectively and were averaged and dichotomized at the median (median = 2.5). In Wave I in-home interview adolescents were also asked whether they had ever skipped a grade [yes/no] and repeated a grade [yes/no].

        Educational aspiration

        Adolescents’ educational aspiration was measured from three questions in Wave I in-home interview asking how much they wanted to go to college, how likely they were to go to college, and how disappointed the adolescent thought his/her mother would be if the adolescent did not graduate from college. Responses were provided in a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher expectation or likelihood of going to college. Because of the likely high correlation between these items, we conducted a polychoric principal factor analysis with varimax rotation among the three questions, and the results suggested a single-factor solution (factor loading: 0.74, 0.77, and 0.71, respectively). We then created the educational aspiration scale by summing the items weighted by their factor loadings, with higher score indicating higher aspiration for college education. In bivariate and multivariable analyses, we standardized the score so that the regression coefficients represent change in outcome with a one-standard deviation change in the educational aspiration score.

        We examined correlation among all predictor variables (i.e., GPA, grade skipping, grade repeating, and educational aspiration) and found low correlations, with polychoric correlation coefficients ranging from 0.01 to 0.34.

        Mediators

        Based on prior literature, we included measures of smoking during pregnancy and timing of prenatal care visit as potential mediators of maternal education variables and birth outcomes. Smoking during pregnancy was assessed at Wave IV for each pregnancy reported. Respondents were asked to report on an ordinal scale how many cigarettes they smoked during their pregnancy (none/a few cigarettes but not every week/a few cigarettes a week but not every day/10 or fewer a day/11-20 a day/21-30 a day/31 or more a day). We dichotomized responses due to sparseness across smoker frequencies in the sample. The timing of prenatal care initiation was based on two questions asked about each pregnancy reported at Wave IV: “During this pregnancy with [partner] did you ever visit a doctor, nurse-midwife or other health care provider for prenatal care, that is, for one or more pregnancy check-ups?” and “How many weeks pregnant were you at the time of your first prenatal care visit?” Responses to these two questions were combined and categorized into three groups: initiated in the first trimester; initiated in the second trimester; and initiated in the third trimester or no prenatal care.

        Controls

        We drew upon our previous analysis of predictors of birth outcomes in this cohort to determine confounders [39]. This analysis indicated effects of race, age at pregnancy, age at Wave I, body mass index (BMI) categories and parental education. Parental education was measured as the higher of either co-residential mother or father: less than high school diploma, high school diploma/GED or higher. BMI was categorized into four groups: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 25.0 kg/m2), overweight (25.0 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 30.0 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2) [40].

        Analyses

        All analyses were conducted in SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina) using survey procedures, which apply population weights and adjust standard errors for non-independence between respondents due to school-based sampling. We began with descriptive statistics (means and percentages) for all analysis variables, then conducted bivariate analyses (t-test, ANOVA or linear regression) to test the crude relationships between analysis variables and birth outcomes. Finally, we implemented multivariable linear regression models to examine the relationship between maternal academic performance and educational aspiration and birth outcomes after controlling for other individual and family characteristics. For each birth outcome (birthweight, gestational age), we examined two models: one without potential mediator variables and the other with potential mediators. Mediation was assessed based on change in effect estimates after inclusion of the mediating variables [41]. Analyses were run stratified on race (Black / non-Black) given prior literature suggesting different associations between maternal education and birth outcomes according to race [9]. Significance testing was conducted at α = 0.05.

        Results

        The characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1. Average age at Wave I, when girls’ academic performance and educational aspiration were examined, was about 15 for both Black and non-Black girls. This was on average about two years before they gave birth. Black adolescent mothers had lower birth weight and a smaller proportion with GPA above median compared with non-Black mothers. The educational aspiration was higher in Black adolescents than in non-Black adolescents. A larger proportion of non-Black girls ever smoked during pregnancy than that in Black girls.
        Table 1

        Characteristics of teen mothers whose first pregnancy occurred during adolescence and after wave 1 at the add health study, 1996-2007 (N = 763)

         

        Overall sample (n = 763)

        Black (n = 244)

        Non-black (n = 519)

        P-value

        Birthweight (kg) (mean[se])

        3.23(0.03)

        3.10(0.05)

        3.27(0.03)

        <0.01

        Gestational age (week) (mean[se])

        39.29(0.11)

        39.16(0.2)

        39.33(0.12)

        0.49

        Baseline age (year) (mean[se])

        15.33(0.14)

        15.36(0.26)

        15.32(0.15)

        0.89

        Age at pregnancy (year) (mean[se])

        17.80(0.09)

        17.67(0.13)

        17.83(0.09)

        0.20

        Baseline BMI category (n [%])

           

        0.03

        Underweight

        96(15.02)

        25(10.88)

        71(16.28)

         

        Normal weight

        508(67.24)

        155(63.43)

        353(68.4)

         

        Over weight

        119(13.07)

        50(20.69)

        69(10.74)

         

        Obese

        40(4.68)

        14(5.00)

        26(4.58)

         

        Parental education ([n%])

           

        0.41

        ≥HS

        606(80.64)

        213(83.44)

        393(79.79)

         

        Less than HS

        157(19.36)

        31(16.56)

        126(20.21)

         

        Educational aspiration(non-standardized) (mean[se])*

        −0.09(0.06)

        0.06(0.09)

        −0.14(0.06)

        0.05

        GPA

           

        0.04

        Below average

        312(42.99)

        98(50.84)

        214(40.59)

         

        Above average

        451(57.01)

        146(49.16)

        305(59.41)

         

        Ever skipped a grade (n [%])

           

        0.85

        No

        744(97.57)

        239(97.78)

        505(97.51)

         

        Yes

        19(2.43)

        5(2.22)

        14(2.49)

         

        Ever repeated a grade (n [%])

           

        0.20

        No

        618(79.82)

        187(75.52)

        431(81.14)

         

        Yes

        145(20.18)

        57(24.48)

        88(18.86)

         

        Smoking during pregnancy (n [%])

           

        <.0001

        No

        607(74.93)

        230(93.81)

        377(69.16)

         

        Yes

        156(25.07)

        14(6.19)

        142(30.84)

         

        Initiation of prenatal care (n [%])

           

        0.58

        1st trimester

        541(69.14)

        174(71.63)

        367(68.37)

         

        2nd trimester

        154(21.77)

        50(21.65)

        104(21.81)

         

        3rd trimester or no prenatal care

        68(9.09)

        20(6.71)

        48(9.82)

         

        *Range of Educational aspiration score (non-standardized):−3.46, 1.23.

        In bivariate analysis, none of the education variables was significantly associated with offspring’s birthweight among Black adolescents while higher educational aspiration and ever skipping a grade were related with higher birthweight in non-Black adolescents. Smoking during pregnancy was positively related with birth weight among Black adolescents (Table 2). Ever skipping a grade was also positively associated with offspring’s gestational age in non-Black girls. Smoking during pregnancy was associated with higher gestational age among Black adolescents (Table 3).
        Table 2

        Bivariate analysis between maternal characteristics, education variables and birthweight (kg) (N = 763)*

         

        Black (n = 244)

        Non-black (n = 519)

        P-value for interaction

         

        Β(se)

        P

        Β(se)

        P

        Baseline age

        −0.03(0.03)

        0.41

        0.004(0.02)

        0.84

        0.42

        Age at pregnancy

        −0.01(0.03)

        0.82

        −0.02(0.03)

        0.59

        0.84

        Baseline BMI category

         

        0.44

         

        0.15

        0.08

        Underweight

        0.13(0.16)

         

        −0.16(0.07)

          

        Normal weight

        ref

         

        ref

          

        Over weight

        0.17(0.12)

         

        −0.10(0.14)

          

        Obese

        −0.15(0.34)

         

        0.04(0.10)

          

        Parental education

         

        0.06

         

        0.51

        0.11

        ≥HS

        ref

         

        ref

          

        Less than HS

        0.16(0.08)

         

        −0.07(0.10)

          

        Educational aspiration standardized

        −0.04(0.06)

        0.46

        0.07(0.03)

        0.03

        0.10

        GPA

         

        0.86

         

        0.63

        0.95

        Below average

        0.02(0.14)

         

        0.03(0.07)

          

        Above average

        ref

         

        ref

          

        Ever skipped a grade

         

        0.35

         

        <0.01

        0.09

        No

        ref

         

        ref

          

        Yes

        0.12(0.13)

         

        0.48(0.15)

          

        Ever repeated a grade

         

        0.44

         

        0.21

        0.63

        No

        ref

         

        ref

          

        Yes

        −0.05(0.07)

         

        −0.11(0.08)

          

        Smoking during pregnancy

         

        0.05

         

        0.36

        0.03

        No

        ref

         

        ref

          

        Yes

        0.24(0.12)

         

        −0.06(0.07)

          

        Initiation of prenatal care

         

        0.47

         

        0.71

        0.71

        1st trimester

        ref

         

        ref

          

        2nd trimester

        0.03(0.10)

         

        0.05(0.07)

          

        3rd trimester or no prenatal care

        −0.11(0.09)

         

        −0.001(0.12)

          

        *Figures presented are regression coefficients with standard errors.

        Table 3

        Bivariate analysis between maternal characteristics, education variables and gestational age (week) (N = 763)*

         

        Black (n = 244)

        Non-black (n = 519)

        P-value for interaction

         

        Β(se)

        P

        Β(se)

        P

        Baseline age

        0.18(0.10)

        0.08

        0.01(0.08)

        0.87

        0.20

        Age at pregnancy

        −0.05(0.10)

        0.60

        −0.07(0.09)

        0.43

        0.86

        Baseline BMI category

         

        0.68

         

        0.47

        0.94

        Underweight

        0.31(0.36)

         

        −0.09(0.27)

          

        Normal weight

        ref

         

        ref

          

        Over weight

        0.18(0.43)

         

        −0.03(0.46)

          

        Obese

        −1.60(2.10)

         

        0.54(0.37)

          

        Parental education

         

        0.16

         

        0.27

        0.08

        ≥HS

        ref

         

        ref

          

        Less than HS

        0.54(0.38)

         

        −0.35(0.32)

          

        Educational aspiration standardized

        −0.07(0.19)

        0.71

        0.09(0.11)

        0.39

        0.44

        GPA

         

        0.54

         

        0.62

        0.42

        Below average

        −0.25(0.41)

         

        0.14(0.28)

          

        Above average

        ref

         

        ref

          

        Ever skipped a grade

         

        0.95

         

        <0.01

        0.29

        No

        ref

         

        ref

          

        Yes

        −0.06(0.88)

         

        0.95(0.32)

          

        Ever repeated a grade

         

        0.29

         

        0.38

        0.18

        No

        ref

         

        ref

          

        Yes

        0.36(0.33)

         

        −0.28(0.32)

          

        Smoking during pregnancy

         

        0.01

         

        0.53

        0.08

        No

        ref

         

        ref

          

        Yes

        0.92(0.36)

         

        0.14(0.21)

          

        Initiation of prenatal care

         

        0.16

         

        0.10

        0.95

        1st trimester

        ref

         

        ref

          

        2nd trimester

        0.66(0.38)

         

        0.55(0.25)

          

        3rd trimester or no prenatal care

        −0.01(0.61)

         

        0.28(0.46)

          

        *Figures presented are regression coefficients with standard errors.

        Multivariable analysis of birthweight is presented in Table 4. Among Black adolescents, ever skipping a grade was associated with 200 grams increase in their offspring’s birthweight when controlling for other variables (p = 0.04). Among non-Black adolescents, ever skipping a grade and higher educational aspiration were associated with higher birthweight (p < 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). After adding the two potential mediators (i.e., smoking during pregnancy and prenatal care visit), the associations between the main predictors and birthweight remained largely the same, suggesting no mediation (model 2, Table 4). However, smoking during pregnancy was significantly positively associated with birthweight in Black girls.
        Table 4

        Multivariable analysis between maternal characteristics, educational variables and birthweight (kg) (N = 763)

         

        Black (n = 244)

        Non-black (n = 519)

         

        Model 1

        Model 2

        Model 1

        Model 2

        Baseline age

        −0.03(0.03)

        −0.03(0.03)

        0.004(0.02)

        0.002(0.02)

        Age at pregnancy

        −0.004(0.03)

        −0.001(0.03)

        −0.03(0.03)

        −0.02(0.03)

        Baseline BMI category

        Underweight

        0.17(0.16)

        0.14(0.16)

        −0.15(0.07)

        −0.15(0.07)

        Normal weight

        ref

        ref

        ref

        ref

        Over weight

        0.15(0.13)

        0.15(0.13)

        −0.11(0.13)

        −0.12(0.13)

        Obese

        −0.17(0.35)

        −0.21(0.37)

        0.06(0.11)

        0.05(0.11)

        Parental education

        ≥HS

        ref

        ref

        ref

        ref

        Less than HS

        0.13(0.08)§

        0.15(0.08)§

        −0.07(0.09)§

        −0.07(0.10)§

        GPA

        Below average

        −0.002(0.14)

        −0.01(0.14)

        0.11(0.07)

        0.12(0.07)

        Above average

        ref

        ref

        ref

        ref

        Ever skipped a grade

        No

        ref

        ref

        ref

        ref

        Yes

        0.20(0.10)*

        0.22(0.09)*

        0.50(0.17)**

        0.49(0.17)**

        Ever repeated a grade

        No

        ref

        ref

        ref

        ref

        Yes

        −0.09(0.07)

        −0.11(0.08)

        −0.08(0.08)

        −0.08(0.08)

        Educational aspiration

        −0.05(0.05)§

        −0.05(0.05)§

        0.08(0.04)

        0.08(0.04)

        Smoking during pregnancy

        No

         

        ref

         

        ref

        Yes

         

        0.31(0.13)

         

        −0.03(0.07)§

        Initiation of prenatal care

        1st trimester

         

        ref

         

        ref

        2nd trimester

         

        0.001(0.09)

         

        0.07(0.06)

        3rd trimester or no prenatal care

         

        −0.06(0.08)

         

        −0.01(0.13)

        *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; §P for interaction <0.05.

        Figures presented are regression coefficients with standard errors.

        For gestational age (Table 5), none of the education variables was significantly related to birth outcomes in Black adolescent girls. Among non-Black adolescents, those who ever skipped a grade had around one week increase in offspring’s gestational age (p = 0.03). The addition of the two potential mediators did not change the association between grade skipping and offspring’s gestational age. Similar to the bivariate analysis, smoking during pregnancy was associated with increased gestational age among Black adolescents.
        Table 5

        Multivariable analysis between maternal characteristics, educational variables and gestational age (week) (N = 763)

         

        Black (n = 244)

        Non-black (n = 519)

         

        Model 1

        Model 2

        Model 1

        Model 2

        Baseline age

        0.19(0.10)

        0.17(0.10)

        0.03(0.10)

        0.01(0.10)

        Age at pregnancy

        −0.13(0.12)

        −0.11(0.12)

        −0.11(0.10)

        −0.09(0.10)

        Baseline BMI category

        Underweight

        0.46(0.42)

        0.36(0.41)

        −0.05(0.29)

        −0.08(0.30)

        Normal weight

        ref

        ref

        ref

        ref

        Over weight

        0.06(0.44)

        −0.01(0.46)

        −0.01(0.44)

        −0.12(0.47)

        Obese

        −1.46(2.09)

        −1.57(2.13)

        0.64(0.36)

        0.62(0.37)

        Parental education

        ≥HS

        ref

        ref

        ref

        ref

        Less than HS

        0.60(0.40)§

        0.64(0.45)§

        −0.43(0.28)§

        −0.40(0.28)§

        GPA

        Below average

        −0.33(0.48)

        −0.31(0.46)

        0.31(0.29)

        0.35(0.30)

        Above average

        ref

        ref

        ref

        ref

        Ever skipped a grade

        No

        ref

        ref

        ref

        ref

        Yes

        −0.28(0.87)

        −0.18(0.88)

        0.97(0.43)*

        1.11(0.43)*

        Ever repeated a grade

        No

        ref

        ref

        ref

        ref

        Yes

        0.11(0.32)

        0.01(0.34)

        −0.31(0.34)

        −0.33(0.35)

        Educational aspiration

        −0.09(0.22)

        −0.08(0.22)

        0.14(0.15)

        0.14(0.15)

        Smoking during pregnancy

        No

         

        ref

         

        ref

        Yes

         

        1.14(0.53)*

         

        0.18(0.23)

        Initiation of prenatal care

        1st trimester

         

        ref

         

        ref

        2nd trimester

         

        0.41(0.36)

         

        0.57(0.25)

        3rd trimester or no prenatal care

         

        −0.07(0.66)

         

        0.30(0.43)

        *P < 0.05; §P for interaction <0.05.

        Figures presented are regression coefficients with standard errors.

        Post-hoc analysis

        As our study sample is a selected one including females whose first pregnancies occurred during adolescence and ended with a singleton live birth, we were concerned about potential sample selection biases that might have influenced our findings. We did a post-hoc analysis examining whether maternal academic performance and educational aspiration during adolescence predicted the likelihood of having teen pregnancy. Among 6,497 adolescent girls with valid sampling weight and non-missing values on all covariates, 1,406 (21.64%) ever had teen pregnancy. Among Black girls (n = 1,491), below-average GPA was associated with a higher risk of teen pregnancy (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.22, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.51-3.26). Among non-Black girls (n = 5,006), below-average GPA, ever skipping a grade, and ever repeating a grade were related with a higher likelihood of teen pregnancy (OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.71-2.57; OR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.08-3.77; and OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.23-2.17, respectively); higher educational aspiration was negatively associated with the risk of teen pregnancy.

        Discussion

        Educational goals and achievements are likely to be particularly important for adolescents, as school is their major social and occupational context [42]. However, most studies that linked maternal education with birth outcomes used maternal educational attainment in adulthood or at the child’s birth [812, 14]. Few studies have explored whether academic performance and educational aspiration during adolescence are associated with birth outcomes among adolescent mothers. In this study, data were collected prospectively, which allowed us to assess academic performance and educational aspiration prior to the teen pregnancy.

        Multivariable analysis indicated that higher aspiration for college education was related to higher birthweight among non-Black adolescents. Higher educational aspiration could indicate a greater future orientation and greater social support [43] which would be associated with healthier pregnancies through health-protective behaviors, such as good nutrition and physical activity [44]. On the other hand, girls who do not have high aspiration for their educational futures may be reflecting a family or community not generally supportive of the girl or her goals, which might translate to reduced social support during pregnancy [45]. It also might indicate their life circumstances, which could include poor health or a community that does not have many people going to college [46, 47]. This may be part of a fatalistic attitude towards pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, which might lead to poorer self-care.

        We found that grade skipping was associated with higher birthweight and gestational age among non-Black girls, as well as higher birthweight among Black girls. Grade skipping is one way to accomplish the concept of appropriate developmental placement [27, 48]. It allows intellectually precocious students to experience more developmentally appropriate content by skipping over what they have already known or can easily learn [49]. It has been suggested to have merit as the intellectually talented students potentially gain intellectual development, interpersonal maturity and time when they advance more quickly through the educational system [27]. It is possible that adolescents who were accelerated had greater social support [50] and personal resilience and thus have healthier lifestyles and behaviors during pregnancy which lead to better birth outcomes.

        No statistically significant relationship was found between adolescents’ GPA and either of the birth outcomes. However, we observed that among non-Black adolescents, those whose GPA was below average had higher birthweight and gestational age than those with GPA above average and the magnitude of the coefficients was larger than that for grade skipping. It is possible that this finding is (partly) due to the imperfect measurement of adolescents’ GPA; adolescents may have mis-reported their letter grades in Wave I in-home interview. Nonetheless, this was an unexpected finding. We tested the interaction between GPA and grade skipping, as well as interaction between GPA and grade repeating, to determine whether a low GPA represented more challenging courses relative to age, but neither was statistically significant (p > 0.05).

        Past studies suggested that the effect of maternal education on birth outcomes could be accounted for by the health-related risk behaviors, particularly maternal smoking and alcohol use during pregnancy and late entry into prenatal care [11, 14, 15, 19]. However, in our study the addition of smoking during pregnancy and prenatal care visit did not change the regression coefficients of the education variables, thus there was little evidence of a mediating effect of these factors. Among Black girls, we were unable to examine the mediating effect of alcohol use during pregnancy due to small cells (i.e. only four girls ever used alcohol during pregnancy). Among non-Black girls, the addition of alcohol use during pregnancy did not change the regression coefficients of the education variables (See Additional file 1: Table S1). There was no relationship between education variables and potential mediator variables. It would be interesting to explore alternative pathways that might explain the effect of adolescent educational aspiration and grade skipping on birth outcomes.

        Surprisingly, we found that smoking during pregnancy was positively related to Black adolescent mothers’ birthweight and gestational age. This finding is inconsistent with extensive literature documenting increased risk of adverse birth outcomes with smoking during pregnancy [51]. It is possible that this unexpected result is due to the very small number of Black adolescent mothers who reported any smoking during pregnancy (n = 14), which may lead to spurious results. It may also be due to sample selection biases, since our sample was limited to mothers who experienced a pregnancy as an adolescent and had a singleton live birth, or reporting biases. Given these potential issues with the ascertainment of smoking during pregnancy, results should be interpreted with caution.

        In the post-hoc analysis, we found that lower GPA was related with a higher risk of teen pregnancy in both Black and non-Black girls, and that higher educational aspiration was related with a lower risk of teen pregnancy in non-Black girls. Our findings were consistent with existing literature which suggests that better grades in school and/or higher educational aspirations are associated with postponed sexual activities [5255]. On the other hand, Tucker et al. did not find a significant association between parental educational expectations and teen pregnancy using data from Add Health [56]. However, the authors used parents’ educational expectations [56] while we examined adolescents’ own educational aspiration. Among non-Black girls, those who ever repeated a grade were more likely to experience teen pregnancy. This is consistent with evidence from existing studies that students who are over-age for grade experience a higher level of emotional stress and more behavioral problems, including substance abuse and early sexual debut [5759]. We found that grade skipping was related with a higher risk of having teen pregnancy among non-Black girls, which is an unexpected finding. There were 24 non-Black girls who ever skipped a grade and had teen pregnancy. With this relatively small cell size, the possibility that this finding is due to chance cannot be ruled out. These results suggest that adolescent girls’ academic performance and educational aspiration influence both the likelihood of getting pregnant as a teenager and birth outcomes of teenage pregnancy.

        Our findings suggest that interventions that affect adolescents’ educational aspirations and grade acceleration might have positive effects on birth outcomes should the adolescent become pregnant. It has been found that both personal and social attributes are important factors that influence educational aspiration and grade acceleration in adolescent students [47, 60, 61]. Adolescents’ liking and enjoyment of school as well as a sense of affinity increases the probability of putting further education into the plan. A friendly atmosphere at school and perceived support from parents are also influential with regard to adolescents’ educational motivation [61]. Wells et al. [50] found that children with parents who more often discuss school programs, school activities, and things studied in class were more likely to have grade acceleration. Thus, the development of a supportive family and school environment is important in stimulating educational aspiration and promoting academic performance, which also has the benefit of being positively associated with birth outcomes among adolescent mothers. In addition, efforts should be made to identify and place students in appropriate learning environment/grades [27, 50].

        Our study used a large, nationally-representative dataset. Measurement of exposures was made prior to outcome data, which allows for the temporal inference between academic performance and educational expectation and the birth outcomes. Despite these strengths, our study has several limitations. First, we used adolescents’ self-reported letter grades rather than school transcript, which would have provided a more accurate and reliable measure of adolescents’ academic performance. The measurement of grade retention was also subject to reporting bias. Second, we reduced our sample size by requiring complete covariate data, which could bias our study results. Analyses comparing included (n = 763) versus excluded (n = 215) adolescents indicated no significant difference in birthweight (p = 0.71), gestational age (p = 0.62), race (p = 0.10), age at pregnancy (p = 0.16), parental education (p = 0.10), GPA (p = 0.41), grade skipping (p = 0.20), adolescents’ educational aspiration (p = 0.15), smoking during pregnancy (p = 0.47), and prenatal care visit (p = 0.17). However, there were significant differences in baseline age (15.33 ± 0.14 vs. 15.91 ± 0.20 in included and excluded sample, respectively; p < 0.001), baseline BMI (22.07 ± 0.19 vs. 22.94 ± 0.44 in included and excluded sample, respectively; p = 0.03), and percent of grade repeating (20.18% vs. 38.35% in included and excluded sample, respectively; p < 0.001). Third, we relied on maternal self-reports of both birthweight and gestational age, which may be subject to recall biases. However, past studies comparing birth records to maternal self-report have found maternal reports of birth outcomes are largely a valid method of obtaining data [62].

        Conclusions

        In summary, we found that grade skipping was associated with higher offspring’s birthweight among Black adolescents, and with higher birthweight and gestational age among non-Black adolescents. Higher educational aspiration was associated with higher birthweight among non-Black adolescents. Future research that explores the pathways by which educational aspiration and grade skipping influence birth outcomes among adolescent mothers could add to our understanding of the determinants of outcomes of teen births. As is reflected in the new Healthy People 2020 goals related to adolescent success in school, a partnership between adolescent-serving clinicians, public health entities, and educational institutions is warranted to improve the well-being of both pregnant and non-pregnant adolescents.

        Abbreviations

        GPA: 

        Grade point average.

        Declarations

        Acknowledgements

        This study was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grant R03 HD067240.

        This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Dr. Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by Dr. J. Richard Udry, Dr. Peter S. Bearman, and Dr. Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due Dr. Ronald R. Rindfuss and Dr. Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website (http://​www.​cpc.​unc.​edu/​addhealth). No direct support was received from grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis.

        Authors’ Affiliations

        (1)
        Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine
        (2)
        Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine

        References

        1. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ: Births: preliminary data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2012,61(5):1–20.
        2. Alexander MR, Salihu HM, Rouse DJ: Survival of triplets who are born to teen mothers in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004,191(6):2097–2102.PubMedView Article
        3. Chen XK, Wen SW, Fleming N, Yang Q, Walker MC: Increased risks of neonatal and postneonatal mortality associated with teenage pregnancy had different explanations. J Clin Epidemiol 2008,61(7):688–694.PubMedView Article
        4. Phipps MG, Blume JD, DeMonner SM: Young maternal age associated with increased risk of postneonatal death. Obstet Gynecol 2002,100(3):481–486.PubMedView Article
        5. Salihu HM, Sharma PP, Ekundayo OJ, Kristensen S, Badewa AP, Kirby RS, Alexander GR: Childhood pregnancy (10–14 years old) and risk of stillbirth in singletons and twins. J Pediatr 2006,148(4):522–526.PubMedView Article
        6. Chen XK, Wen SW, Fleming N, Yang Q, Walker MC: Teenage pregnancy and congenital anomalies: which system is vulnerable? Hum Reprod 2007,22(6):1730–1735.PubMedView Article
        7. Koniak-Griffin D, Turner-Pluta C: Health risks and psychosocial outcomes of early childbearing: a review of the literature. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2001,15(2):1–17.PubMedView Article
        8. Luo ZC, Wilkins R, Kramer MS: Effect of neighbourhood income and maternal education on birth outcomes: a population-based study. CMAJ 2006,174(10):1415–1420.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
        9. Shmueli A, Cullen MR: Birth weight, maternal age, and education: new observations from Connecticut and Virginia. Yale J Biol Med 1999,72(4):245–258.PubMed CentralPubMed
        10. Gale CR, Johnson W, Deary IJ, Schoon I, Batty GD: Intelligence in girls and their subsequent smoking behaviour as mothers: the 1958 National child development study and the 1970 British cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 2009,38(1):173–181.PubMedView Article
        11. van den Berg G, Van Eijsden M, Vrijkotte TG, Gemke RJ: Educational inequalities in perinatal outcomes: the mediating effect of smoking and environmental tobacco exposure. PLoS One 2012,7(5):e37002.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
        12. Millar WJ, Chen J: Maternal education and risk factors for small-for-gestational-age births. Health Rep 1998,2(2):43–51. (Eng); 47–56 (Fre)
        13. Parker JD, Schoendorf KC, Kiely JL: Associations between measures of socioeconomic status and low birth weight, small for gestational age, and premature delivery in the United States. Ann Epidemiol 1994,4(4):271–278.PubMedView Article
        14. Morgen CS, Bjork C, Andersen PK, Mortensen LH, Nybo Andersen AM: Socioeconomic position and the risk of preterm birth–a study within the Danish National birth cohort. Int J Epidemiol 2008,37(5):1109–1120.PubMedView Article
        15. Fuchs VR: Economic aspects of health. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1982.View Article
        16. Kandel DB, Griesler PC, Schaffran C: Educational attainment and smoking among women: risk factors and consequences for offspring. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009,104(Suppl 1):S24-S33.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
        17. Lindqvist R, Aberg H: Who stops smoking during pregnancy? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001,80(2):137–141.PubMedView Article
        18. Mathews TJ: Smoking during pregnancy in the 1990s. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2001,49(7):1–14.
        19. Kramer MS, Seguin L, Lydon J, Goulet L: Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2000,14(3):194–210.PubMedView Article
        20. Hueston WJ, Geesey ME, Diaz V: Prenatal care initiation among pregnant teens in the United States: an analysis over 25 years. J Adolesc Health 2008,42(3):243–248.PubMedView Article
        21. Cooney JP: What determines the start of prenatal care? Prenatal care, insurance, and education. Med Care 1985,23(8):986–997.PubMedView Article
        22. Regenstein M, Cummings L, Huang J: Barriers to adolescent prenatal care: findings from a Survey of Low-Income and Uninsured Women Who Deliver at Safety Net Hospitals. Washington, DC: National Public Health and Hospital Institute; 2005:39.
        23. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020. Available at http://​www.​healthypeople.​gov/​2020/​topicsobjectives​2020/​default.​aspx. Accessed in December, 2012.
        24. Rumberger RW: Dropping out of middle school: a multilevel analysis of students and schools. Am Educ Res J 1995,32(3):583–625.View Article
        25. Marjoribanks K: Family background, academic achievement, and educational aspirations as predictors of Australian young adults’ educational attainment. Psychol Rep 2005,96(3 Pt 1):751–754.PubMedView Article
        26. Southern WT, Jones ED: Types of acceleration: dimensions and issues. In A nation deceived: how schools hold back America’s brightest students. 2nd edition. Edited by: M U M Gross, Colangelo N, Assouline S. Iowa City: The University of Iowa, The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development; 2004:5–12.
        27. Park G, Lubinski D, Benbow CP: When less is more: effects of grade skipping on adult STEM productivity among mathematically precocious adolescents. J Educ Psychol 2013,105(1):176–198.View Article
        28. Morin AJ, Rodriguez D, Fallu JS, Maiano C, Janosz M: Academic achievement and smoking initiation in adolescence: a general growth mixture analysis. Addiction 2012,107(4):819–828.PubMedView Article
        29. Pennanen M, Haukkala A, De Vries H, Vartiainen E: Academic achievement and smoking: is self-efficacy an important factor in understanding social inequalities in Finnish adolescents? Scand J Public Health 2011,39(7):714–722.PubMedView Article
        30. Cox RG, Zhang L, Johnson WD, Bender DR: Academic performance and substance use: findings from a state survey of public high school students. J Sch Health 2007,77(3):109–115.PubMedView Article
        31. Diego MA, Field TM, Sanders CE: Academic performance, popularity, and depression predict adolescent substance use. Adolescence 2003,38(149):35–42.PubMed
        32. Spriggs AL, Halpern CT: Timing of sexual debut and initiation of postsecondary education by early adulthood. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2008,40(3):152–161.PubMedView Article
        33. Farrington DP: Early predictors of adolescent aggression and adult violence. Violence Vict 1989,4(2):79–100.PubMed
        34. Herrenkohl TI, Maguin E, Hill KG, Hawkins JD, Abbott RD, Catalano RF: Developmental risk factors for youth violence. J Adolesc Health 2000,26(3):176–186.PubMedView Article
        35. Short JD, Slusher IL: Adolescent pregnancy. Ky Nurse 1994,42(3):36–37.PubMed
        36. Holden GW, Nelson PB, Velasquez J, Ritchie KL: Cognitive, psychosocial, and reported sexual behavior differences between pregnant and nonpregnant adolescents. Adolescence 1993,28(111):557–572.PubMed
        37. Harris KM: The National longitudinal study of adolescent health (Add Health), Waves I & II, 1994–1996; Wave III, 2001–2002; Wave IV, 2007–2009 [machine-readable data file and documentation]. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2009.
        38. Harris KM: Design Features of Add Health. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2011.
        39. Harville EW, Madkour AS, Xie Y: Predictors of birthweight and gestational age among adolescents. Am J Epidemiol 2012,176(Suppl 7):S150-S163.PubMedView Article
        40. World Health Organization: Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000, 894:1–253.
        41. Baron RM, Kenny DA: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986,51(6):1173–1182.PubMedView Article
        42. Eccles JS, Roeser RW: Schools as developmental contexts. In Blackwell Handbook of Adolescence Edited by: Adams GR, Berzonsky MD. 2006, 129–148.View Article
        43. Alloway N, Gilbert P, Gilbert R, Muspratt S: Factors impacting on students aspirations and expectations in regional Australia. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training; 2004.
        44. Feldman PJ, Dunkel-Schetter C, Sandman CA, Wadhwa PD: Maternal social support predicts birth weight and fetal growth in human pregnancy. Psychosom Med 2000,62(5):715–725.PubMed
        45. Rodgers KB, Rose HA: Personal, family, and school factors related to adolescent academic performance. Marriage Fam Rev 2001,33(4):47–61.View Article
        46. Stewart EB, Stewart EA, Simons RL: The effect of neighborhood context on the college aspirations of African American adolescents. Am Educ Res J 2007,44(4):896–919.View Article
        47. Ryan AM: The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Dev 2001,72(4):1135–1150.PubMedView Article
        48. Lubinski D, Benbow CP: States of excellence. Am Psychol 2000, 55:137–150.PubMedView Article
        49. Colangelo N, Assouline SG, Lupkowski-Shoplik AE: Whole-grade acceleration. In A nation deceived: how schools hold back America’s brightest students. Edited by: M U M Gross, Colangelo N, Assouline SG. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press; 2004:77–86.
        50. Wells R, Lohman D, Marron M: What factors are associated with grade acceleration? An analysis and comparison of two U.S. databases. J Adv Academics 2009,20(2):248–273.View Article
        51. Floyd RL, Rimer BK, Giovino GA, Mullen PD, Sullivan SE: A review of smoking in pregnancy: effects on pregnancy outcomes and cessation efforts. Annu Rev Public Health 1993, 14:379–411.PubMedView Article
        52. Scott-Jones D, White AB: Correlates of sexual activity in early adolescence. J Early Adolesc 1990,10(2):221–238.View Article
        53. Ohannessian CM, Crockett LJ: A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between educational investment and adolescent sexual activity. J Adolesc Res 1993,8(2):167–182.View Article
        54. Miller BC, Sneesby KR: Educational correlates of adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. J Youth Adolesc 1988,17(6):521–530.PubMedView Article
        55. Miller PY, Simon W: Adolescent sexual behavior: context and change. Soc Prob 1974,22(1):58–75.View Article
        56. Tucker C, Perreira K, Halpern CT: Parenting strategies and teenage pregnancy. Presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting: Washington, DC; 2011. March/April
        57. Byrd R, Weitzman M, Auinger P: Increased behavior problems associated with delayed school entry and delayed school progress. Pediatr Rev 1997, 100:654–661.View Article
        58. Byrd R, Weitzman M, Doniger A: Increased drug use among old-forgrade adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996, 150:470–476.PubMedView Article
        59. Resnick MD, Bearman PS, Blum RW, Bauman KE, Harris KM, Jones J, Tabor J, Beuhring T, Sieving RE, Shew M, et al.: Protecting adolescents from harm: findings from the National longitudinal study on adolescent health. JAMA 1997,278(10):823–832.PubMedView Article
        60. Garg R, Kauppi C, Lewko J, Urajnik D: A structural model of educational aspirations. J Career Dev 2002, 29:87–108.View Article
        61. Madarasova Geckova A, Tavel P, Van Dijk JP, Abel T, Reijneveld SA: Factors associated with educational aspirations among adolescents: cues to counteract socioeconomic differences? BMC Public Health 2010, 10:154.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
        62. Tomeo CA, Rich-Edwards JW, Michels KB, Berkey CS, Hunter DJ, Frazier AL, Willett WC, Buka SL: Reproducibility and validity of maternal recall of pregnancy-related events. Epidemiology 1999,10(6):774–777.PubMedView Article
        63. Pre-publication history

          1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2393/​14/​3/​prepub

        Copyright

        © Xie et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

        This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.