A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework
© Raynes-Greenow et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 17 December 2012
Accepted: 24 January 2013
Published: 5 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christine East|
|8 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ingela Radestad|
|13 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tomasina Stacey|
|18 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Camille Raynes-Greenow|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ingela Radestad|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|5 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2393-13-32|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.