Duration and urgency of transfer in births planned at home and in freestanding midwifery units in England: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study
© Rowe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 10 September 2013
Accepted: 27 November 2013
Published: 5 December 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Sep 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judy Slome Cohain|
|25 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eileen Hutton|
|20 Nov 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Rachel Rowe|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Nov 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Nov 2013||Editorially accepted|
|5 Dec 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2393-13-224|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.