Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Has increased clinical experience with methotrexate reduced the direct costs of medical management of ectopic pregnancy compared to surgery?

  • Daniel T Westaby1,
  • Olivia Wu2,
  • W Colin Duncan1,
  • Hilary OD Critchley1,
  • Stephen Tong3 and
  • Andrew W Horne1Email author
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth201212:98

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-98

Received: 16 January 2012

Accepted: 17 September 2012

Published: 17 September 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Horne
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janine Elson
19 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cecily Begley
10 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Horne
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
3 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Horne
Resubmission - Version 6
3 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
17 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
17 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2393-12-98

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Queen’s Medical Research Institute
(2)
Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment Unit, University of Glasgow
(3)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne

Advertisement