Revising acute care systems and processes to improve breastfeeding and maternal postnatal health: a pre and post intervention study in one English maternity unit
© Bick et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 22 November 2011
Accepted: 17 May 2012
Published: 6 June 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lotta Mellander|
|9 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paula Sisk|
|14 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Cheyne|
|8 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Debra Bick|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lotta Mellander|
|30 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paula Sisk|
|16 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Debra Bick|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|6 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2393-12-41|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.