Comparing the odds of postpartum haemorrhage in planned home birth against planned hospital birth: results of an observational study of over 500,000 maternities in the UK
© Nove et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 15 January 2012
Accepted: 21 September 2012
Published: 19 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Jan 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ank de Jonge|
|20 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Bisits|
|30 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Andrea Nove|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ank de Jonge|
|15 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Andrea Nove|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|19 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2393-12-130|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.