Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Making pragmatic choices: women’s experiences of delivery care in Northern Ethiopia

  • Tesfay Gebrehiwot1Email author,
  • Isabel Goicolea2,
  • Kerstin Edin2 and
  • Miguel San Sebastian2
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth201212:113

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-113

Received: 18 January 2012

Accepted: 5 October 2012

Published: 19 October 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
18 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Moke Magoma
2 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jos van Roosmalen
11 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Tesfay Gebregzabher Gebrehiwot
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Moke Magoma
31 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jos van Roosmalen
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
19 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2393-12-113

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University