Recovery after caesarean birth: a qualitative study of women's accounts in Victoria, Australia
© Kealy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 11 May 2010
Accepted: 18 August 2010
Published: 18 August 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 May 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana Pilar Betrán|
|18 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ingela Wiklund|
|20 Jul 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Michelle Kealy|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Jul 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana Pilar Betrán|
|10 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ingela Wiklund|
|17 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Michelle Kealy|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Aug 2010||Editorially accepted|
|18 Aug 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2393-10-47|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.