Institutional delivery in rural India: the relative importance of accessibility and economic status
© Kesterton et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 21 August 2009
Accepted: 6 June 2010
Published: 6 June 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Aug 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Premananda Bharati|
|19 Jan 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Howard|
|12 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Amy, Judith Kesterton|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Howard|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Jun 2010||Editorially accepted|
|6 Jun 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2393-10-30|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.