Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas John Bisika |
22 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Imran Morhason-Bello |
24 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Béatrice Nikiema |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
30 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Declare Mushi |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
30 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
1 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Declare Mushi |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
11 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Declare Mushi |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
11 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
18 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Declare Mushi |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
18 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
22 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Declare Mushi |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
22 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
29 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Declare Mushi |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
29 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
1 Apr 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
1 Apr 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-10-14 |
You can find further information about peer review here.